Rows or Columns? Minimizing Presentation Bias When Comparing Multiple Recommender Systems

Patrik Dokoupil, Ladislav Peška, Ludovico Boratto
{"title":"Rows or Columns? Minimizing Presentation Bias When Comparing Multiple Recommender Systems","authors":"Patrik Dokoupil, Ladislav Peška, Ludovico Boratto","doi":"10.1145/3539618.3592056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Going beyond accuracy in the evaluation of a recommender system is an aspect that is receiving more and more attention. Among the many perspectives that can be considered, the impact of presentation bias is of central importance. Under presentation bias, the attention of the users to the items in a recommendation list changes, thus affecting their possibility to be considered and the effectiveness of a model. Page-wise within-subject studies are widely employed in the recommender systems literature to compare algorithms by displaying their results in parallel. However, no study has ever been performed to assess the impact of presentation bias in this context. In this paper, we characterize how presentation bias affects different layout options, which present the results in column- or row-wise fashion. Concretely, we present a user study where six layout variants are proposed to the users in a page-wise within-subject setting, so as to evaluate their perception of the displayed recommendations. Results show that presentation bias impacts users clicking behavior (low-level feedback), but not so much the perceived performance of a recommender system (high-level feedback). Source codes and raw results are available at https://tinyurl.com/PresBiasSIGIR2023.","PeriodicalId":425056,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3539618.3592056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Going beyond accuracy in the evaluation of a recommender system is an aspect that is receiving more and more attention. Among the many perspectives that can be considered, the impact of presentation bias is of central importance. Under presentation bias, the attention of the users to the items in a recommendation list changes, thus affecting their possibility to be considered and the effectiveness of a model. Page-wise within-subject studies are widely employed in the recommender systems literature to compare algorithms by displaying their results in parallel. However, no study has ever been performed to assess the impact of presentation bias in this context. In this paper, we characterize how presentation bias affects different layout options, which present the results in column- or row-wise fashion. Concretely, we present a user study where six layout variants are proposed to the users in a page-wise within-subject setting, so as to evaluate their perception of the displayed recommendations. Results show that presentation bias impacts users clicking behavior (low-level feedback), but not so much the perceived performance of a recommender system (high-level feedback). Source codes and raw results are available at https://tinyurl.com/PresBiasSIGIR2023.
行还是列?在比较多个推荐系统时最小化呈现偏差
在推荐系统的评价中,超越准确性是一个越来越受到关注的方面。在可以考虑的许多观点中,呈现偏见的影响是至关重要的。在呈现偏差下,用户对推荐列表中项目的关注发生了变化,从而影响了它们被考虑的可能性和模型的有效性。主题内页面研究在推荐系统文献中被广泛应用,通过并行显示它们的结果来比较算法。然而,目前还没有研究评估在这种情况下呈现偏见的影响。在本文中,我们描述了显示偏差如何影响不同的布局选项,这些布局选项以列或行方式显示结果。具体而言,我们提出了一项用户研究,其中在页面内主题设置中向用户提出了六种布局变体,以评估他们对显示推荐的感知。结果表明,呈现偏见会影响用户的点击行为(低水平反馈),但对推荐系统的感知性能影响不大(高水平反馈)。源代码和原始结果可在https://tinyurl.com/PresBiasSIGIR2023上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信