Pulmonary Impairment Does Not Limit Exercise Capacity in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis with Low Disease Activity

F. Dağ, Ö. B. Çimen, O. Güvener, Gizem Erzurumluoğlu, D. Çelikcan, G. Sahin
{"title":"Pulmonary Impairment Does Not Limit Exercise Capacity in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis with Low Disease Activity","authors":"F. Dağ, Ö. B. Çimen, O. Güvener, Gizem Erzurumluoğlu, D. Çelikcan, G. Sahin","doi":"10.5336/SPORTSCI.2018-60142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: To evaluate aerobic capacity and pulmonary function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and compare these to the healthy controls and to investigate the possible relationship between aerobic capacity, pulmonary function and disease-specific measures. Material and Methods: Fourteen AS patients and 14 healthy controls were included in this prospective study. Clinical disease indices (BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Assessment Index, BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, BASMI: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index) were assessed. Participants completed questionnaires assessing physical activity level and quality of life. Aerobic capacity was assessed by submaximal treadmill test with breath-bybreath gas analysis. Aerobic capacity and pulmonary function tests were performed by an ergospirometry system. Results: The results of exercise tolerance test were similar in both groups (VO2max for AS and control group; 40.03±6.11 and 40.28±4.54). AS patients had significantly lower vital capacity (VC) (4.42±0.72 and 5.37±0.72), and forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.36±0.82 and 5.32±0.71) and forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1) (3.57±0.74 and 4.20±0.58) than healthy controls. Pulmonary function test results were not correlated with the disease duration, chest expansion and other clinical variables. In AS patients, only BASMI score showed significant association with FVC, FEV1, VC and chest expansion. No association between aerobic capacity and pulmonary function test variables, chest expansion, BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI was observed. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of physical activity level. Physical function, physical role limitations and bodily pain scores were significantly lower in AS group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicated that aerobic capacity in AS patients is not influenced by the reduced pulmonary function, probably due to the maintenance of an active life style.","PeriodicalId":177041,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/SPORTSCI.2018-60142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABS TRACT Objective: To evaluate aerobic capacity and pulmonary function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and compare these to the healthy controls and to investigate the possible relationship between aerobic capacity, pulmonary function and disease-specific measures. Material and Methods: Fourteen AS patients and 14 healthy controls were included in this prospective study. Clinical disease indices (BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Assessment Index, BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, BASMI: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index) were assessed. Participants completed questionnaires assessing physical activity level and quality of life. Aerobic capacity was assessed by submaximal treadmill test with breath-bybreath gas analysis. Aerobic capacity and pulmonary function tests were performed by an ergospirometry system. Results: The results of exercise tolerance test were similar in both groups (VO2max for AS and control group; 40.03±6.11 and 40.28±4.54). AS patients had significantly lower vital capacity (VC) (4.42±0.72 and 5.37±0.72), and forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.36±0.82 and 5.32±0.71) and forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1) (3.57±0.74 and 4.20±0.58) than healthy controls. Pulmonary function test results were not correlated with the disease duration, chest expansion and other clinical variables. In AS patients, only BASMI score showed significant association with FVC, FEV1, VC and chest expansion. No association between aerobic capacity and pulmonary function test variables, chest expansion, BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI was observed. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of physical activity level. Physical function, physical role limitations and bodily pain scores were significantly lower in AS group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicated that aerobic capacity in AS patients is not influenced by the reduced pulmonary function, probably due to the maintenance of an active life style.
低疾病活动度强直性脊柱炎患者肺功能损害不限制运动能力
目的:评价强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的有氧能力和肺功能,并与健康对照进行比较,探讨有氧能力、肺功能与疾病特异性措施之间可能的关系。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究纳入14例AS患者和14例健康对照。评估临床疾病指标(BASDAI:浴缸强直性脊柱炎疾病评估指数、BASFI:浴缸强直性脊柱炎功能指数、BASMI:浴缸强直性脊柱炎计量指数)。参与者完成了评估身体活动水平和生活质量的问卷调查。通过次最大跑步机试验和呼吸气体分析来评估有氧能力。有氧能力和肺功能测试由肺活量测定系统进行。结果:两组运动耐力试验结果相似(AS组与对照组VO2max;40.03±6.11和40.28±4.54)。AS患者肺活量(VC)(4.42±0.72和5.37±0.72)、用力肺活量(FVC)(4.36±0.82和5.32±0.71)和第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)(3.57±0.74和4.20±0.58)明显低于健康对照组。肺功能检查结果与病程、胸廓扩张等临床变量无相关性。在AS患者中,只有BASMI评分与FVC、FEV1、VC和胸部扩张有显著相关性。有氧能力与肺功能测试变量、胸扩张、BASDAI、BASMI、BASFI无相关性。在体力活动水平方面,两组之间没有显著差异。AS组身体功能、身体角色限制、身体疼痛评分均显著低于对照组(p<0.05)。结论:这些结果表明,AS患者的有氧能力不受肺功能下降的影响,可能是由于维持积极的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信