A maximum agreement approach to information fusion

M. Cai, Y. Lin, C. L. Liu, C. Ji, W. Zhang
{"title":"A maximum agreement approach to information fusion","authors":"M. Cai, Y. Lin, C. L. Liu, C. Ji, W. Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3018896.3036367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information fusion is a generic technique for the problem of information fusion. The common features with this problem are (1) there is a target system X and its state (S) is to be inferred or predicted, (2) there is a group of sensors which have a varying degree of imprecise connection with S of X, and (3) there is a need to come up with an agreed inference or prediction on the state of X (note that consensus here does not mean all with the same opinion by the group). Elsewhere, we proposed an approach called \"maximum agreement (MA)\" to information fusion in general and probability distribution function aggregation in specific. The basic idea of MA is that an agreed inference is a function of individual sensors' measurements and the agreed measurement can be determined based on the goal that the agreed judgment has a maximum consensus with all individual sensors' measurements. In this paper, we show some alternative methods of MA and discuss their characteristics with reference to MA. We shall then conclude that MA is the best method among all the alternative methods for the problem of expert opinion aggregation or consensus aggregation.","PeriodicalId":131464,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3018896.3036367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information fusion is a generic technique for the problem of information fusion. The common features with this problem are (1) there is a target system X and its state (S) is to be inferred or predicted, (2) there is a group of sensors which have a varying degree of imprecise connection with S of X, and (3) there is a need to come up with an agreed inference or prediction on the state of X (note that consensus here does not mean all with the same opinion by the group). Elsewhere, we proposed an approach called "maximum agreement (MA)" to information fusion in general and probability distribution function aggregation in specific. The basic idea of MA is that an agreed inference is a function of individual sensors' measurements and the agreed measurement can be determined based on the goal that the agreed judgment has a maximum consensus with all individual sensors' measurements. In this paper, we show some alternative methods of MA and discuss their characteristics with reference to MA. We shall then conclude that MA is the best method among all the alternative methods for the problem of expert opinion aggregation or consensus aggregation.
信息融合的最大一致性方法
信息融合是解决信息融合问题的一种通用技术。这个问题的共同特征是(1)有一个目标系统X,它的状态(S)需要推断或预测,(2)有一组传感器与S (X)有不同程度的不精确连接,(3)需要对X的状态提出一个一致的推断或预测(注意,这里的共识并不意味着所有人都有相同的意见)。另外,我们提出了一种称为“最大一致性(MA)”的方法来进行一般的信息融合和具体的概率分布函数聚合。MA的基本思想是,商定的推理是单个传感器测量的函数,商定的测量可以基于商定的判断与所有单个传感器的测量具有最大一致性的目标来确定。本文介绍了几种可选的遗传分析方法,并结合遗传分析讨论了它们的特点。因此,我们将得出结论,对于专家意见聚合或共识聚合问题,MA是所有替代方法中最好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信