Surveillance in the System: Data as Critical Change in Higher Education

Samantha Szcyrek, Bonnie E. Stewart
{"title":"Surveillance in the System: Data as Critical Change in Higher Education","authors":"Samantha Szcyrek, Bonnie E. Stewart","doi":"10.18357/otessaj.2022.2.2.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over recent decades, higher education infrastructures have become increasingly digitized and datafied. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of online learning platforms, trading the walls of the classroom for digital systems. Yet the surveillance, privacy, and discrimination issues that such systems raise are minimally understood by those who teach and learn within them. This paper overviews a 2020 pilot survey and 2021-2022 qualitative study of higher education instructors on a global scale. These projects explored the ways in which instructors from various locales and academic status positions understand data and classroom tools using proxy questions surrounding knowledge, practices, experiences, and perspectives. This paper draws on those studies to frame concerns about datafication amplifying issues in higher education. Its premises are twofold: first, if higher education instructors, as knowledge workers, are not knowledgeable about the contexts within which they teach and conduct scholarship, then the construct of shared governance within higher education is inevitably undermined. Secondly, if faculty and academic decision-makers are not intentional about equitable and ethical use of digital platforms within higher education, students’ privacy and data is at risk. In this conceptual paper, we outline findings that frame datafication as a critical change within higher education culture.","PeriodicalId":242908,"journal":{"name":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2022.2.2.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over recent decades, higher education infrastructures have become increasingly digitized and datafied. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of online learning platforms, trading the walls of the classroom for digital systems. Yet the surveillance, privacy, and discrimination issues that such systems raise are minimally understood by those who teach and learn within them. This paper overviews a 2020 pilot survey and 2021-2022 qualitative study of higher education instructors on a global scale. These projects explored the ways in which instructors from various locales and academic status positions understand data and classroom tools using proxy questions surrounding knowledge, practices, experiences, and perspectives. This paper draws on those studies to frame concerns about datafication amplifying issues in higher education. Its premises are twofold: first, if higher education instructors, as knowledge workers, are not knowledgeable about the contexts within which they teach and conduct scholarship, then the construct of shared governance within higher education is inevitably undermined. Secondly, if faculty and academic decision-makers are not intentional about equitable and ethical use of digital platforms within higher education, students’ privacy and data is at risk. In this conceptual paper, we outline findings that frame datafication as a critical change within higher education culture.
系统中的监控:数据作为高等教育的关键变革
近几十年来,高等教育基础设施日益数字化和数据化。2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了在线学习平台的普及,将教室的墙壁换成了数字系统。然而,这些系统所引发的监视、隐私和歧视问题,在其中教学的人却知之甚少。本文概述了2020年全球范围内高等教育教师的试点调查和2021-2022年定性研究。这些项目探索了来自不同地区和学术地位的教师如何通过围绕知识、实践、经验和观点的代理问题来理解数据和课堂工具。本文以这些研究为基础,提出了对高等教育信息化放大问题的关注。其前提有两个:首先,如果作为知识工作者的高等教育教师不了解他们教授和开展学术研究的环境,那么高等教育内部共享治理的构建将不可避免地受到破坏。其次,如果教师和学术决策者没有意识到在高等教育中公平和道德地使用数字平台,学生的隐私和数据就会面临风险。在这篇概念性论文中,我们概述了将数据化视为高等教育文化中一个关键变化的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信