Nonlinear Analysis in Pressure Vessel Design Codes: Recommendations for Codified Rules Improvements

C. Faidy
{"title":"Nonlinear Analysis in Pressure Vessel Design Codes: Recommendations for Codified Rules Improvements","authors":"C. Faidy","doi":"10.1115/ICONE26-81095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past 30 years the main rules to design pressure vessels were based on elastic analyses. Many conservatisms associated to these different elastic approaches are discussed in this paper, like: stress criteria linearization for 3-D components, stress classification in nozzle areas, plastic shake down analysis, fatigue analysis, Ke evaluation, and pipe stress criteria for elastic follow-up due to thermal expansion or seismic loads...\n This paper will improve existing codified rules in nuclear and non-nuclear Codes that are proposed as alternatives to elastic evaluation for different failure modes and degradation mechanisms: plastic collapse, plastic instability, tri-axial local failure, rupture of cracked component, fatigue and Ke, plastic shakedown. These methods are based on limit loads, monotonic or cyclic elastic-plastic analyses.\n Concerned components are mainly vessels and piping systems.\n No existing Code is sufficiently detailed to be easily applied; the needs are stress analysis methods through finite elements, material properties including material constitutive equations and criteria associated to each methods and each failure modes.\n A first set of recommendation to perform these inelastic analysis will be presented to improve existing codes on an international harmonized way, associated to all material properties and criteria needed to apply these modern methods. An international draft Code Case is in preparation.","PeriodicalId":354697,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-81095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During the past 30 years the main rules to design pressure vessels were based on elastic analyses. Many conservatisms associated to these different elastic approaches are discussed in this paper, like: stress criteria linearization for 3-D components, stress classification in nozzle areas, plastic shake down analysis, fatigue analysis, Ke evaluation, and pipe stress criteria for elastic follow-up due to thermal expansion or seismic loads... This paper will improve existing codified rules in nuclear and non-nuclear Codes that are proposed as alternatives to elastic evaluation for different failure modes and degradation mechanisms: plastic collapse, plastic instability, tri-axial local failure, rupture of cracked component, fatigue and Ke, plastic shakedown. These methods are based on limit loads, monotonic or cyclic elastic-plastic analyses. Concerned components are mainly vessels and piping systems. No existing Code is sufficiently detailed to be easily applied; the needs are stress analysis methods through finite elements, material properties including material constitutive equations and criteria associated to each methods and each failure modes. A first set of recommendation to perform these inelastic analysis will be presented to improve existing codes on an international harmonized way, associated to all material properties and criteria needed to apply these modern methods. An international draft Code Case is in preparation.
压力容器设计规范中的非线性分析:改进规范的建议
在过去的30年中,设计压力容器的主要规则是基于弹性分析。本文讨论了与这些不同的弹性方法相关的许多保守性,如:三维构件的应力准则线性化,喷嘴区域的应力分类,塑性振动分析,疲劳分析,Ke评估以及由于热膨胀或地震载荷引起的弹性随动的管道应力准则。本文将改进核和非核规范中现有的编纂规则,这些规则被提出作为不同破坏模式和退化机制的弹性评估的替代方案:塑性破坏,塑性失稳,三轴局部破坏,裂纹构件破裂,疲劳和Ke,塑性安定。这些方法是基于极限载荷、单调或循环弹塑性分析。相关部件主要是容器和管道系统。现有的《守则》没有详尽到可以轻易适用;需要的是通过有限元的应力分析方法,材料特性,包括与每种方法和每种失效模式相关的材料本构方程和准则。将提出第一套执行这些非弹性分析的建议,以国际统一的方式改进现有的规范,与应用这些现代方法所需的所有材料特性和标准相关。正在编写一项国际《治罪法案例》草案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信