Full Abstraction and the Context Lemma

T. Jim, A. Meyer
{"title":"Full Abstraction and the Context Lemma","authors":"T. Jim, A. Meyer","doi":"10.1137/S0097539791224212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is impossible to add a combinator to PCF to achieve full abstraction for models such as Berry''s stable domains in a way analogous to the addition of the \"parallel-or\" combinator that achieves full abstraction for the familiar cpo model. In particular, we define a general notion of rewriting system of the kind used for evaluating simply typed l-terms in Scott''s PCF. Any simply type l-calculus with such a \"PCF-like\" rewriting semantics is shown necessarily to satisfy Milner''s Context Lemma. A simple argument demonstrates that any denotational semantics that is adequate for PCF, and in which certain simple Boolean functionals exist, cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF satisfying the Context Lemma. An immediate corollary is that stable domains cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF definable by PCF-like rules.","PeriodicalId":160227,"journal":{"name":"SIAM journal on computing (Print)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM journal on computing (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539791224212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

It is impossible to add a combinator to PCF to achieve full abstraction for models such as Berry''s stable domains in a way analogous to the addition of the "parallel-or" combinator that achieves full abstraction for the familiar cpo model. In particular, we define a general notion of rewriting system of the kind used for evaluating simply typed l-terms in Scott''s PCF. Any simply type l-calculus with such a "PCF-like" rewriting semantics is shown necessarily to satisfy Milner''s Context Lemma. A simple argument demonstrates that any denotational semantics that is adequate for PCF, and in which certain simple Boolean functionals exist, cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF satisfying the Context Lemma. An immediate corollary is that stable domains cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF definable by PCF-like rules.
完全抽象和上下文引理
在PCF中添加一个组合子来实现像Berry稳定域这样的模型的完全抽象是不可能的,就像在cpo模型中添加“parallel-or”组合子来实现完全抽象一样。特别地,我们定义了在Scott的PCF中用于求简单类型l项的重写系统的一般概念。任何具有这种“类pcf”重写语义的简单型l-演算都必须满足Milner的上下文引理。一个简单的论证表明,任何适合PCF的指称语义,以及存在某些简单布尔函数的指称语义,对于满足上下文引理的PCF的任何扩展都不能是完全抽象的。一个直接的推论是,对于由类PCF规则定义的PCF的任何扩展,稳定域都不能是完全抽象的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书