Comparing summarisation techniques for informal online reviews

Mhairi McNeill, R. Raeside, Martin Graham, I. Roseboom
{"title":"Comparing summarisation techniques for informal online reviews","authors":"Mhairi McNeill, R. Raeside, Martin Graham, I. Roseboom","doi":"10.5220/0005612203220329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate three methods for summarising game reviews written in a casual style. This was done in order to create a review summarisation system to be used by clients of deltaDNA. We look at one well-known method based on natural language processing, and describe two statistical methods that could be used for summarisation: one based on TF-IDF scores another using supervised latent Dirichlet allocation. We find, due to the informality of these online reviews, that natural language based techniques work less well than they do on other types of reviews, and we recommend using techniques based on the statistical properties of the words' frequencies. In particular, we decided to use a TF-IDF score based system in the final system.","PeriodicalId":102743,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005612203220329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate three methods for summarising game reviews written in a casual style. This was done in order to create a review summarisation system to be used by clients of deltaDNA. We look at one well-known method based on natural language processing, and describe two statistical methods that could be used for summarisation: one based on TF-IDF scores another using supervised latent Dirichlet allocation. We find, due to the informality of these online reviews, that natural language based techniques work less well than they do on other types of reviews, and we recommend using techniques based on the statistical properties of the words' frequencies. In particular, we decided to use a TF-IDF score based system in the final system.
比较非正式在线评论的摘要技术
在本文中,我们将评估总结休闲风格游戏评论的三种方法。这样做是为了创建一个供deltaDNA客户使用的审查总结系统。我们研究了一种基于自然语言处理的知名方法,并描述了两种可用于总结的统计方法:一种基于TF-IDF评分,另一种使用监督潜在狄利克雷分配。我们发现,由于这些在线评论的非正式性,基于自然语言的技术在其他类型的评论上的效果不如它们好,我们建议使用基于单词频率统计属性的技术。特别是,我们决定在最终系统中使用基于TF-IDF分数的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信