Patterns and Patterning: A Study of Four Poems by George Herbert (review)

Michael Piret
{"title":"Patterns and Patterning: A Study of Four Poems by George Herbert (review)","authors":"Michael Piret","doi":"10.1353/ghj.1985.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a contextual study after the manner of Rosemond Tuve and in the tradition of Rosemary Freeman. Its aim is \"to establish the intended meaning of certain poems by George Herbert,\" its method the application of historical information about pattern poems and Renaissance emblematics to \"The Altar,\" \"Easter-wings,\" \"The Pilgrimage,\" and \"Love\" (III). Westerweel seems fully aware of the special accidents that can befall imprudent contextual studies, and indeed he objects to the way in which \"Tuve's scholarly method, however useful as a means of transmitting information, has a tendency to crush the poem through sheer weight of annotation.\" He even invokes an article in which F.R. Leavis, almost furiously attacking the New Scholarship that Tuve represented, had dismissed A Reading of George Herbert as a species of book that was \"inimical to criticism, that is, to intelligence\" (Scrutiny, 19 [1953], 162-83). \"Relevance,\" says Westerweel, \"would seem to be a key term here.\" The sage contextual scholar must avoid irrelevance, and vigilantly \"sift evidence that clarifies the poem's meaning from material that does not.\"","PeriodicalId":143254,"journal":{"name":"George Herbert Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Herbert Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ghj.1985.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a contextual study after the manner of Rosemond Tuve and in the tradition of Rosemary Freeman. Its aim is "to establish the intended meaning of certain poems by George Herbert," its method the application of historical information about pattern poems and Renaissance emblematics to "The Altar," "Easter-wings," "The Pilgrimage," and "Love" (III). Westerweel seems fully aware of the special accidents that can befall imprudent contextual studies, and indeed he objects to the way in which "Tuve's scholarly method, however useful as a means of transmitting information, has a tendency to crush the poem through sheer weight of annotation." He even invokes an article in which F.R. Leavis, almost furiously attacking the New Scholarship that Tuve represented, had dismissed A Reading of George Herbert as a species of book that was "inimical to criticism, that is, to intelligence" (Scrutiny, 19 [1953], 162-83). "Relevance," says Westerweel, "would seem to be a key term here." The sage contextual scholar must avoid irrelevance, and vigilantly "sift evidence that clarifies the poem's meaning from material that does not."
模式与模式:乔治·赫伯特四首诗研究(评论)
这是根据罗斯蒙德·图夫的方式和罗斯玛丽·弗里曼的传统进行的语境研究。它的目的是“确立乔治·赫伯特某些诗歌的预期意义”,它的方法是将关于模式诗的历史信息和文艺复兴时期的象征应用于《祭坛》、《复活节之翼》、《朝圣》、和“爱”(III)。韦斯特韦尔似乎充分意识到,不谨慎的语境研究可能会带来特殊的意外,而且他确实反对“图夫的学术方法,尽管作为一种传递信息的手段很有用,但有一种倾向,即通过纯粹的注释来粉碎诗歌。”他甚至引用了f·r·里维斯(F.R. Leavis)的一篇文章,这篇文章几乎是在猛烈地攻击图夫所代表的新学术,他认为《乔治·赫伯特的阅读》是一种“不利于批评,也就是不利于智力”的书(《审视》,19[1953],162-83)。韦斯特韦尔说:“相关性似乎是这里的一个关键术语。”贤明的文脉学者必须避免无关紧要,并警惕地“从那些不能澄清诗歌含义的材料中筛选证据”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信