Fighting or encouraging, but not ignoring – different attitudes towards migration

Arūnas Molis, Nigar Rzaguliyeva
{"title":"Fighting or encouraging, but not ignoring – different attitudes towards migration","authors":"Arūnas Molis, Nigar Rzaguliyeva","doi":"10.22364/hssl.31.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current discourse on the tendencies of the migration very often excludes migrants from the normal fabric of society, not just as aliens, but as aliens who represent risk to national security. It frames the key question about the future of the political community as one of a choice for or against migration. It sometimes reproduces the political myth that a homogenous national community or western civilization existed in the past and can be re-established today through the exclusion of migrants who are identified as cultural aliens (Huysmans 2000, 758). This article examines the roots and the reasons of such discourse while examining some recent broadly discussed cases of the migration.","PeriodicalId":120611,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.31.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current discourse on the tendencies of the migration very often excludes migrants from the normal fabric of society, not just as aliens, but as aliens who represent risk to national security. It frames the key question about the future of the political community as one of a choice for or against migration. It sometimes reproduces the political myth that a homogenous national community or western civilization existed in the past and can be re-established today through the exclusion of migrants who are identified as cultural aliens (Huysmans 2000, 758). This article examines the roots and the reasons of such discourse while examining some recent broadly discussed cases of the migration.
反对或鼓励,但不是忽视——对移民的不同态度
目前关于移徙趋势的论述往往将移徙者排除在正常社会结构之外,不仅将其视为外国人,而且将其视为对国家安全构成威胁的外国人。它将政治共同体未来的关键问题框定为支持或反对移民的选择之一。它有时会再现一种政治神话,即过去存在过一个同质的民族共同体或西方文明,今天可以通过排斥被认定为文化外来者的移民而重新建立起来(Huysmans 2000, 758)。本文考察了这种话语的根源和原因,同时考察了最近被广泛讨论的移民案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信