Linking Land Use Choice with Land Access in Nigerian Agrarian Communities

E. Etowa, Emmanuel D. Nwiido
{"title":"Linking Land Use Choice with Land Access in Nigerian Agrarian Communities","authors":"E. Etowa, Emmanuel D. Nwiido","doi":"10.1177/2321024918808112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides overview of land use decisions in the face of numerous bottlenecks within Nigerian agrarian population. Using a case study, the effects of access to land on land use choice were analysed. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select 104 respondents from 13 communities in Odukpani, Nigeria. A logistic regression model was specified to achieve the analyses. The result of the model was preceded by socio-demographic statistics of the study population. It was found that majority (92.3 per cent) of those with access to land had ownership rights, while 7.7 per cent had only land use rights. However, most (68.5 per cent) of them accessed 0.9 or less hectare of land, only 2.2 per cent had access to up to one or more hectare of land. Land was mainly devoted to agriculture in Odukpani. The logistic regression analyses showed that the size of land accessed has no significant effect on how it is used. However, having land ownership right is 0.1641 times likely to favour land use principally for agriculture than only having land use right. Conversely, having only land use right was 1/0.1641 (or 6.0939) times more likely to cause land use for agriculture than having land ownership right. Interestingly, a unit increase in perceived educational constraint increased the probability of land use for agriculture by 10.9133 times. Similarly, access to credit increased the probability of land use for agriculture by 23.5003 times, while short payback period of the loan received had a retarding effect on land use for agriculture by 0.1763 times. Psychometric scale scores showed that the cost of land (3.97), increase in land speculation (3.79) and conflict of interests by landlord (3.75) were the top three perceived constraints to accessing land in the study population. The study recommends agricultural development policies directed in favour of land access and with a view to tackling the identified constraints.","PeriodicalId":118277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2321024918808112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article provides overview of land use decisions in the face of numerous bottlenecks within Nigerian agrarian population. Using a case study, the effects of access to land on land use choice were analysed. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select 104 respondents from 13 communities in Odukpani, Nigeria. A logistic regression model was specified to achieve the analyses. The result of the model was preceded by socio-demographic statistics of the study population. It was found that majority (92.3 per cent) of those with access to land had ownership rights, while 7.7 per cent had only land use rights. However, most (68.5 per cent) of them accessed 0.9 or less hectare of land, only 2.2 per cent had access to up to one or more hectare of land. Land was mainly devoted to agriculture in Odukpani. The logistic regression analyses showed that the size of land accessed has no significant effect on how it is used. However, having land ownership right is 0.1641 times likely to favour land use principally for agriculture than only having land use right. Conversely, having only land use right was 1/0.1641 (or 6.0939) times more likely to cause land use for agriculture than having land ownership right. Interestingly, a unit increase in perceived educational constraint increased the probability of land use for agriculture by 10.9133 times. Similarly, access to credit increased the probability of land use for agriculture by 23.5003 times, while short payback period of the loan received had a retarding effect on land use for agriculture by 0.1763 times. Psychometric scale scores showed that the cost of land (3.97), increase in land speculation (3.79) and conflict of interests by landlord (3.75) were the top three perceived constraints to accessing land in the study population. The study recommends agricultural development policies directed in favour of land access and with a view to tackling the identified constraints.
尼日利亚农业社区土地使用选择与土地获取的联系
这篇文章概述了在尼日利亚农业人口面临众多瓶颈时的土地利用决策。通过案例分析,分析了土地获取对土地利用选择的影响。采用分层随机抽样技术,从尼日利亚奥杜帕尼的13个社区选出104名受访者。一个逻辑回归模型被指定来实现分析。该模型的结果是在研究人群的社会人口统计之前得出的。调查发现,大多数(92.3%)获得土地的人拥有所有权,而7.7%的人只拥有土地使用权。然而,他们中的大多数(68.5%)获得0.9公顷或更少的土地,只有2.2%获得一公顷或更多公顷的土地。在Odukpani,土地主要用于农业。logistic回归分析表明,土地获取规模对土地利用方式无显著影响。然而,拥有土地所有权的人倾向于主要用于农业的可能性是只拥有土地使用权的人的0.1641倍。相反,仅拥有土地使用权导致农业用地的可能性是拥有土地所有权的1/0.1641(或6.0939)倍。有趣的是,教育约束的单位增加增加了土地用于农业的可能性10.9133倍。同样,获得信贷使农业用地的可能性增加了23.5003倍,而收到的贷款回收期短对农业用地的阻碍作用为0.1763倍。心理测量量表得分显示,土地成本(3.97)、土地投机增加(3.79)和地主利益冲突(3.75)是研究人群认为的获取土地的三大制约因素。该研究建议制定有利于土地获取的农业发展政策,并着眼于解决已确定的制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信