Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in middle Tennessee, 1989-1990.

Reviews of infectious diseases Pub Date : 1991-09-01
J S Currier, H Campbell, R Platt, A B Kaiser
{"title":"Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in middle Tennessee, 1989-1990.","authors":"J S Currier,&nbsp;H Campbell,&nbsp;R Platt,&nbsp;A B Kaiser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patterns of use of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis were assessed in a randomly selected sample of short-stay hospitals in middle Tennessee. Overall, 438 procedures (48%) were associated with antimicrobial prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was more common in hospitals with more than 400 beds than in smaller hospitals. Moreover, prophylactic antibiotics were given more often for procedures with a proven indication for prophylaxis than for those without a proven indication (60% vs. 41%, P less than .05); this relationship remained constant regardless of hospital size (common odds ratio, 2.09). However, prophylaxis for procedures with a proven indication was more likely to be given in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratios, 5.41 vs. 1.94). The duration of prophylaxis was less than 2 days for 89% of procedures. A wide variety of agents were used. This study suggests that while improvements have been made over the past decade in decisions about the duration of prophylaxis, considerable variation remains in the selection of the procedures in which such treatment is administered and of the antimicrobial agents used.</p>","PeriodicalId":21184,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of infectious diseases","volume":"13 Suppl 10 ","pages":"S874-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patterns of use of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis were assessed in a randomly selected sample of short-stay hospitals in middle Tennessee. Overall, 438 procedures (48%) were associated with antimicrobial prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was more common in hospitals with more than 400 beds than in smaller hospitals. Moreover, prophylactic antibiotics were given more often for procedures with a proven indication for prophylaxis than for those without a proven indication (60% vs. 41%, P less than .05); this relationship remained constant regardless of hospital size (common odds ratio, 2.09). However, prophylaxis for procedures with a proven indication was more likely to be given in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratios, 5.41 vs. 1.94). The duration of prophylaxis was less than 2 days for 89% of procedures. A wide variety of agents were used. This study suggests that while improvements have been made over the past decade in decisions about the duration of prophylaxis, considerable variation remains in the selection of the procedures in which such treatment is administered and of the antimicrobial agents used.

1989-1990年田纳西州中部围手术期抗菌素预防。
在田纳西州中部的短期住院医院随机选择样本,评估围手术期抗菌药物预防的使用模式。总体而言,438例手术(48%)与抗菌素预防相关。在床位超过400张的医院中,预防措施比在规模较小的医院中更为普遍。此外,对于有明确的预防指征的手术,预防性抗生素的使用频率高于无明确指征的手术(60%对41%,P < 0.05);无论医院规模大小,这种关系都保持不变(共同优势比,2.09)。然而,教学医院比非教学医院更有可能对证实有适应证的手术进行预防(优势比,5.41 vs. 1.94)。89%的手术预防持续时间少于2天。使用了各种各样的药剂。这项研究表明,虽然在过去十年中关于预防持续时间的决定取得了进展,但在选择进行这种治疗的程序和使用的抗菌剂方面仍然存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信