A comparative analysis of evolutionary algorithms for the prediction of software change

Loveleen Kaur, A. Mishra
{"title":"A comparative analysis of evolutionary algorithms for the prediction of software change","authors":"Loveleen Kaur, A. Mishra","doi":"10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2018.8605988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change-proneness prediction of software components has become a significant research area wherein the quest for the best classifier still persists. Although numerous statistical and Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been presented and employed in the past literature for an efficient generation of change-proneness prediction models, evolutionary algorithms, on the other hand, remain vastly unexamined and unaddressed for this purpose. Bearing this in mind, this research work targets to probe the potency of six evolutionary algorithms for developing such change prediction models, specifically for source code files. We employ apposite object oriented metrics to construct four software datasets from four consecutive releases of a software project. Furthermore, the prediction capability of the selected evolutionary algorithms is evaluated, ranked and compared against two statistical classifiers using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman statistical test. On the basis of the results obtained from the experiments conducted in this article, it can be ascertained that the evolutionary algorithms possess a capability for predicting change-prone files with high accuracies, sometimes even higher than the selected statistical classifiers.","PeriodicalId":319472,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2018.8605988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Change-proneness prediction of software components has become a significant research area wherein the quest for the best classifier still persists. Although numerous statistical and Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been presented and employed in the past literature for an efficient generation of change-proneness prediction models, evolutionary algorithms, on the other hand, remain vastly unexamined and unaddressed for this purpose. Bearing this in mind, this research work targets to probe the potency of six evolutionary algorithms for developing such change prediction models, specifically for source code files. We employ apposite object oriented metrics to construct four software datasets from four consecutive releases of a software project. Furthermore, the prediction capability of the selected evolutionary algorithms is evaluated, ranked and compared against two statistical classifiers using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman statistical test. On the basis of the results obtained from the experiments conducted in this article, it can be ascertained that the evolutionary algorithms possess a capability for predicting change-prone files with high accuracies, sometimes even higher than the selected statistical classifiers.
软件变更预测的进化算法比较分析
软件组件的变化倾向预测已经成为一个重要的研究领域,其中对最佳分类器的追求仍然存在。尽管在过去的文献中已经提出并使用了许多统计和机器学习(ML)技术来有效地生成变化倾向预测模型,但另一方面,进化算法在这方面仍然没有得到广泛的研究和解决。考虑到这一点,本研究工作的目标是探索六种进化算法的效力,以开发这种变化预测模型,特别是对于源代码文件。我们使用合适的面向对象的度量来从软件项目的四个连续版本中构建四个软件数据集。此外,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Friedman统计检验对所选进化算法的预测能力进行了评估、排序和比较。根据本文的实验结果,可以确定进化算法对易发生变化的文件具有较高的预测精度,有时甚至高于所选的统计分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信