Reliability study of high-pin-count flip-chip BGA

Yuan Li, J. Xie, T. Verma, V. Wang
{"title":"Reliability study of high-pin-count flip-chip BGA","authors":"Yuan Li, J. Xie, T. Verma, V. Wang","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2001.927735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A family of 1.0-mm pitch full-array flip-chip BGAs were developed. These packages vary from 27 to 45 mm in package size, 15 to 25 mm in die size, and 672 to 1020 in ball count. With dies and packages so large, solder joint fatigue failure and underfill delamination, induced by thermal expansion mismatch, are a major concern. Finite element analysis was set up for efficient reliability analysis. Two substrates, hi-CTE ceramic (12/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C) and BT (17/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C), are compared. Hi-CTE ceramic substrate has a better CTE match with die (2.6/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C), therefore, it was surmised that hi-CTE ceramic would improve component-level reliability yet with satisfactory board-level reliability. To validate it, several die and package combinations were modeled using both substrates. Both component-level stresses and board-level solder joint fatigue life were compared. In addition, design of experiment (DOE) was used to study the effect of properties and dimensions of underfill and heat spreader on solder joint fatigue life. The effect of pad opening size was also quantified. Finally, the effect of underfill on interface stress between underfill and die was investigated.","PeriodicalId":340217,"journal":{"name":"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2001.927735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

A family of 1.0-mm pitch full-array flip-chip BGAs were developed. These packages vary from 27 to 45 mm in package size, 15 to 25 mm in die size, and 672 to 1020 in ball count. With dies and packages so large, solder joint fatigue failure and underfill delamination, induced by thermal expansion mismatch, are a major concern. Finite element analysis was set up for efficient reliability analysis. Two substrates, hi-CTE ceramic (12/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C) and BT (17/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C), are compared. Hi-CTE ceramic substrate has a better CTE match with die (2.6/spl times/10/sup -6///spl deg/C), therefore, it was surmised that hi-CTE ceramic would improve component-level reliability yet with satisfactory board-level reliability. To validate it, several die and package combinations were modeled using both substrates. Both component-level stresses and board-level solder joint fatigue life were compared. In addition, design of experiment (DOE) was used to study the effect of properties and dimensions of underfill and heat spreader on solder joint fatigue life. The effect of pad opening size was also quantified. Finally, the effect of underfill on interface stress between underfill and die was investigated.
高引脚数倒装BGA可靠性研究
开发了一系列1.0 mm间距全阵列倒装芯片bga。这些封装从27到45毫米的封装尺寸,15到25毫米的模具尺寸,672到1020的球数不等。由于模具和封装如此之大,由热膨胀失配引起的焊点疲劳失效和填充层脱层是主要问题。为了有效地进行可靠性分析,建立了有限元分析方法。比较了两种衬底,高cte陶瓷(12/spl次/10/sup -6// spl度/C)和BT (17/spl次/10/sup -6// spl度/C)。Hi-CTE陶瓷衬底与模具具有更好的CTE匹配(2.6/spl次/10/sup -6// spl度/C),因此,推测Hi-CTE陶瓷将提高组件级可靠性,同时具有令人满意的板级可靠性。为了验证它,使用这两种基板对几个模具和封装组合进行了建模。对元件级应力和板级焊点疲劳寿命进行了比较。此外,采用试验设计法研究了下填料和导热片的性能和尺寸对焊点疲劳寿命的影响。定量分析了衬垫开口大小对其影响。最后,研究了充填体对充填体与模具界面应力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信