Conferences and Symposia

Jaei Staff
{"title":"Conferences and Symposia","authors":"Jaei Staff","doi":"10.1525/mua.1992.16.2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 23-27 March 1981, an IAEA Technical Committee and Workshop was convened in Erice to critically assess the so-called alternative fusion concepts. There were 38 participants from 12 countries at the Meeting, which partly coincided in time with the 5th Course of the Erice International School of Fusion Reactor Technology, dedicated to \"Unconventional Approaches to Fusion\". This made it possible for the participants of the Course to attend the IAEA Workshop and contribute to the discussions. As was suggested by the International Fusion Research Council, the Workshop concentrated on five alternative lines of approach to fusion: Stellarator, Reversed-Field Pinch, Bumpy Torus, Open-Confinement Configurations, and the broad class of experiments presently grouped under the name of Compact Toroids. At the general sessions, each concept was introduced through an overview of its state-of-the-art and a number of contributed papers, whereupon the individual subgroups met to discuss critical issues and then to consider and revise the Summaries prepared by the respective group chairmen. The five chairmen (listed here alphabetically, as are their summaries in Section 2) were L. Berry (ORNL) — Bumpy Torus, H.A.B. Bodin (Culham) Reversed-Field Pinch (RFP), C.W. Hartman (LLNL) — Open-Confinement Configurations, R.K. Linford (LASL) Compact Toroids, and D. Pfirsch (Garching) — Stellarators. At an additional session (Miscellanea) chaired by H. Obayashi (IPP, Nagoya), a number of contributions on high-density Z-pinches, plasma focus, screw pinches, etc. were presented and discussed; however, given the state of the art of these concepts, no attempt was made to critically assess them on a similar basis as the other five systems. (The interested reader is referred to the Proceedings of the 5th Erice School on Fusion Reactor Technology, where these papers will appear along with other contributions on the same subjects.) In addition to the five Summaries, this report includes an Appendix consisting of Tables I—V which show, for each concept, the parameters that best represent the achieved results, or the data expected for future devices, and the extrapolations to reactor requirements. Serious questions of physics, technology and economics of controlled fusion as a practical energy source have yet to be resolved. This involves exploring the full capability of the present plasma confinement systems and developing new ones. Within the existing framework of the international fusion programme, one approach which is most vigorously pursued is the tokamak. It has reached the combination of plasma parameters nearest to breakeven for fusion. Nevertheless, a tokamak reactor as presently conceived presents rather difficult technological and economic problems. Therefore, a large number of alternative concepts is actively studied, in order that the issues that bar the path to fusion power might be resolved. Among them the stellarator, the bumpy torus, the endplugged-mirror and the reversed-field pinch concepts (some existing in a number of distinct variations and magnetic geometries) have reached a development stage, in the understanding and the plasma parameters, that encourages tests of their future potential in experiments of a level comparable to what has been PLT for the tokamak line. The compact toroid concept represents a broad variety of experiments, aiming at much simpler reactor structures. They seem quite promising, but their development is one stage behind the previous group. In fact, even if many among them have already been explored in the past, only recently a new effort, justified by a better understanding of many physics issues, has been supported. Although these alternative concepts seem to offer specific reactor advantages relative to the tokamak, it is clear that","PeriodicalId":237125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/mua.1992.16.2.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 23-27 March 1981, an IAEA Technical Committee and Workshop was convened in Erice to critically assess the so-called alternative fusion concepts. There were 38 participants from 12 countries at the Meeting, which partly coincided in time with the 5th Course of the Erice International School of Fusion Reactor Technology, dedicated to "Unconventional Approaches to Fusion". This made it possible for the participants of the Course to attend the IAEA Workshop and contribute to the discussions. As was suggested by the International Fusion Research Council, the Workshop concentrated on five alternative lines of approach to fusion: Stellarator, Reversed-Field Pinch, Bumpy Torus, Open-Confinement Configurations, and the broad class of experiments presently grouped under the name of Compact Toroids. At the general sessions, each concept was introduced through an overview of its state-of-the-art and a number of contributed papers, whereupon the individual subgroups met to discuss critical issues and then to consider and revise the Summaries prepared by the respective group chairmen. The five chairmen (listed here alphabetically, as are their summaries in Section 2) were L. Berry (ORNL) — Bumpy Torus, H.A.B. Bodin (Culham) Reversed-Field Pinch (RFP), C.W. Hartman (LLNL) — Open-Confinement Configurations, R.K. Linford (LASL) Compact Toroids, and D. Pfirsch (Garching) — Stellarators. At an additional session (Miscellanea) chaired by H. Obayashi (IPP, Nagoya), a number of contributions on high-density Z-pinches, plasma focus, screw pinches, etc. were presented and discussed; however, given the state of the art of these concepts, no attempt was made to critically assess them on a similar basis as the other five systems. (The interested reader is referred to the Proceedings of the 5th Erice School on Fusion Reactor Technology, where these papers will appear along with other contributions on the same subjects.) In addition to the five Summaries, this report includes an Appendix consisting of Tables I—V which show, for each concept, the parameters that best represent the achieved results, or the data expected for future devices, and the extrapolations to reactor requirements. Serious questions of physics, technology and economics of controlled fusion as a practical energy source have yet to be resolved. This involves exploring the full capability of the present plasma confinement systems and developing new ones. Within the existing framework of the international fusion programme, one approach which is most vigorously pursued is the tokamak. It has reached the combination of plasma parameters nearest to breakeven for fusion. Nevertheless, a tokamak reactor as presently conceived presents rather difficult technological and economic problems. Therefore, a large number of alternative concepts is actively studied, in order that the issues that bar the path to fusion power might be resolved. Among them the stellarator, the bumpy torus, the endplugged-mirror and the reversed-field pinch concepts (some existing in a number of distinct variations and magnetic geometries) have reached a development stage, in the understanding and the plasma parameters, that encourages tests of their future potential in experiments of a level comparable to what has been PLT for the tokamak line. The compact toroid concept represents a broad variety of experiments, aiming at much simpler reactor structures. They seem quite promising, but their development is one stage behind the previous group. In fact, even if many among them have already been explored in the past, only recently a new effort, justified by a better understanding of many physics issues, has been supported. Although these alternative concepts seem to offer specific reactor advantages relative to the tokamak, it is clear that
会议及专题讨论会
1981年3月23日至27日,原子能机构技术委员会和讲习班在埃里斯召开,以严格评价所谓的替代性核聚变概念。来自12个国家的38名与会者参加了会议,会议部分时间与Erice国际聚变反应堆技术学院第五期课程相吻合,该课程致力于“非常规聚变方法”。这使得培训班的参加者有可能参加原子能机构讲习班并对讨论作出贡献。根据国际核聚变研究理事会的建议,研讨会集中讨论了五种可供选择的核聚变方法:仿星器、反向场捏、凹凸环面、开放约束构型,以及目前被归类为紧凑环面的大类实验。在一般性会议上,每项概念都是通过对其最新情况的概述和一些提交的文件介绍的,然后各小组开会讨论关键问题,然后审议和修订各小组主席编写的摘要。五位主席(按字母顺序列出,如第2节所述)是L. Berry (ORNL) -凹凸环面,H.A.B. Bodin (Culham)反场Pinch (RFP), C.W. Hartman (LLNL) -开放约束构型,R.K. Linford (LASL)紧致环面和D. Pfirsch (Garching) -恒星。在另一个由H. Obayashi (IPP, Nagoya)主持的会议(Miscellanea)上,介绍和讨论了关于高密度z -捏、等离子聚焦、螺旋捏等方面的一些贡献;但是,鉴于这些概念的技术水平,没有试图在与其他五个系统类似的基础上对它们进行批判性评价。(感兴趣的读者可参考第五理工学院关于聚变反应堆技术的论文集,这些论文将与其他关于同一主题的文章一起发表。)除了五个摘要外,本报告还包括一个由表I-V组成的附录,其中显示了每个概念最能代表已取得结果的参数,或未来设备的预期数据,以及对反应堆要求的推断。控制核聚变作为一种实用能源的物理、技术和经济方面的严重问题尚未得到解决。这包括探索现有等离子体约束系统的全部能力并开发新的系统。在国际核聚变方案的现有框架内,最积极采用的一种方法是托卡马克。它已经达到了最接近核聚变收支平衡的等离子体参数组合。然而,目前设想的托卡马克反应堆存在相当困难的技术和经济问题。因此,人们正在积极研究大量的替代概念,以便解决阻碍核聚变发电的问题。其中仿星器、凹凸环面、端塞镜和反场掐点概念(其中一些存在于许多不同的变体和磁几何形状中)在理解和等离子体参数方面已达到发展阶段,这鼓励在可与托卡马克线PLT相媲美的水平的实验中测试它们的未来潜力。紧凑环面概念代表了各种各样的实验,目标是更简单的反应堆结构。它们看起来很有前途,但它们的发展比前一组落后一个阶段。事实上,即使它们中的许多在过去已经被探索过,直到最近才有一项新的努力得到支持,因为对许多物理问题有了更好的理解。尽管这些替代概念似乎提供了相对于托卡马克的特定反应堆优势,但很明显
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信