Automatic Kernel Offload Using BPF

Farbod Shahinfar, S. Miano, G. Siracusano, R. Bifulco, Aurojit Panda, G. Antichi
{"title":"Automatic Kernel Offload Using BPF","authors":"Farbod Shahinfar, S. Miano, G. Siracusano, R. Bifulco, Aurojit Panda, G. Antichi","doi":"10.1145/3593856.3595888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BPF support in Linux has made kernel extensions easier. Recent efforts have shown that using BPF to offload portions of server applications, e.g., memcached and service proxies, can improve application performance and efficiency. However, thus far, the community has not looked at the question of what parts of an application should be offloaded? This paper first shows that blindly offloading application functionality to the kernel is neither beneficial nor desirable, and care must be taken when deciding what to offload. Furthermore, when deciding what to offload, developers must consider not just the application, but also the workload being handled, and the kernel being targetted, Therefore, we advocate automating this decision process in a compiler, that can analyze application code, and produce two executables, a kernel offload and a userspace program, that jointly implement the application's functionality. This paper discusses the challenges that must be addressed to build such a compiler, and why they can be feasibly addressed.","PeriodicalId":330470,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593856.3595888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BPF support in Linux has made kernel extensions easier. Recent efforts have shown that using BPF to offload portions of server applications, e.g., memcached and service proxies, can improve application performance and efficiency. However, thus far, the community has not looked at the question of what parts of an application should be offloaded? This paper first shows that blindly offloading application functionality to the kernel is neither beneficial nor desirable, and care must be taken when deciding what to offload. Furthermore, when deciding what to offload, developers must consider not just the application, but also the workload being handled, and the kernel being targetted, Therefore, we advocate automating this decision process in a compiler, that can analyze application code, and produce two executables, a kernel offload and a userspace program, that jointly implement the application's functionality. This paper discusses the challenges that must be addressed to build such a compiler, and why they can be feasibly addressed.
使用BPF的自动内核卸载
Linux中的BPF支持使内核扩展变得更加容易。最近的研究表明,使用BPF卸载部分服务器应用程序(例如memcached和服务代理)可以提高应用程序的性能和效率。然而,到目前为止,社区还没有研究应用程序的哪些部分应该卸载的问题?本文首先表明,盲目地将应用程序功能卸载到内核中既没有好处,也不可取,在决定卸载哪些功能时必须小心。此外,在决定卸载什么时,开发人员不仅要考虑应用程序,还要考虑正在处理的工作负载和目标内核。因此,我们提倡在编译器中自动化这个决策过程,它可以分析应用程序代码,并产生两个可执行程序,一个内核卸载程序和一个用户空间程序,它们共同实现应用程序的功能。本文讨论了构建这样一个编译器必须解决的挑战,以及为什么可以切实解决这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信