{"title":"Considering Class: College Access and Diversity","authors":"M. Gaertner, M. Hart","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2137126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each time that the continued legality of race-conscious affirmative action is threatened, colleges and universities must confront the possibility of dramatically changing their admissions policies. Fisher v. University of Texas, which the Supreme Court will hear this year, presents just such a moment. In previous years when affirmative action has been outlawed by ballot initiative in specific states or when the Court has seemed poised to reject it entirely, there have been calls for replacing race-conscious admissions with class-based affirmative action. Supporters of race-conscious affirmative action have typically criticized the class-based alternative as ineffective at maintaining racial diversity. This article presents the results of a study conducted at the University of Colorado in 2008 and 2010 that challenges that common assertion. We present a class-based affirmative action policy that led to increased socioeconomic diversity as well as slightly increased racial diversity in two entering freshmen classes. This study, the first done at a moderately selective university, shows how class-based affirmative action can be an effective tool for admitting a class of students that is diverse both socioeconomically and racially. Even if the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of race-conscious college admissions, class-based policies are attractive as a supplement to race-conscious policies. The challenges associated with low socioeconomic status are different from those associated with minority status, and there are good reasons to seek equal opportunity along both lines.","PeriodicalId":144581,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Law and Policy Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Law and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2137126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Abstract
Each time that the continued legality of race-conscious affirmative action is threatened, colleges and universities must confront the possibility of dramatically changing their admissions policies. Fisher v. University of Texas, which the Supreme Court will hear this year, presents just such a moment. In previous years when affirmative action has been outlawed by ballot initiative in specific states or when the Court has seemed poised to reject it entirely, there have been calls for replacing race-conscious admissions with class-based affirmative action. Supporters of race-conscious affirmative action have typically criticized the class-based alternative as ineffective at maintaining racial diversity. This article presents the results of a study conducted at the University of Colorado in 2008 and 2010 that challenges that common assertion. We present a class-based affirmative action policy that led to increased socioeconomic diversity as well as slightly increased racial diversity in two entering freshmen classes. This study, the first done at a moderately selective university, shows how class-based affirmative action can be an effective tool for admitting a class of students that is diverse both socioeconomically and racially. Even if the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of race-conscious college admissions, class-based policies are attractive as a supplement to race-conscious policies. The challenges associated with low socioeconomic status are different from those associated with minority status, and there are good reasons to seek equal opportunity along both lines.
每次种族歧视平权行动的合法性受到威胁时,学院和大学都必须面对大幅改变招生政策的可能性。最高法院今年将审理的费舍尔诉德克萨斯大学案(Fisher v. University of Texas)就是这样一个时刻。在过去的几年里,当平权法案在特定的州通过投票倡议被宣布为非法,或者当最高法院似乎准备完全拒绝它时,就有人呼吁用基于阶级的平权法案取代种族意识的录取。有种族意识的平权行动的支持者通常批评以阶级为基础的替代方案在维持种族多样性方面是无效的。这篇文章展示了科罗拉多大学在2008年和2010年进行的一项研究的结果,该研究对这种普遍的说法提出了挑战。我们提出了一项基于阶级的平权行动政策,该政策在两个新生班级中增加了社会经济多样性,并略微增加了种族多样性。这项研究首次在一所中等选择性的大学进行,它显示了基于阶级的平权法案如何成为录取社会经济和种族多样化学生的有效工具。即使大法院支持种族意识大学录取的合宪性,作为种族意识政策的补充,基于阶级的政策也很有吸引力。与低社会经济地位相关的挑战与与少数民族身份相关的挑战不同,我们有充分的理由在这两方面寻求平等的机会。