Symbolic Methods in Computational Cryptography Proofs

G. Barthe, B. Grégoire, Charlie Jacomme, S. Kremer, Pierre-Yves Strub
{"title":"Symbolic Methods in Computational Cryptography Proofs","authors":"G. Barthe, B. Grégoire, Charlie Jacomme, S. Kremer, Pierre-Yves Strub","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2019.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code-based game-playing is a popular methodology for proving security of cryptographic constructions and side-channel countermeasures. This methodology relies on treating cryptographic proofs as an instance of relational program verification (between probabilistic programs), and decomposing the latter into a series of elementary relational program verification steps. In this paper, we develop principled methods for proving such elementary steps for probabilistic programs that operate over finite fields and related algebraic structures. We focus on three essential properties: program equivalence, information flow, and uniformity. We give characterizations of these properties based on deducibility and other notions from symbolic cryptography. We use (sometimes improve) tools from symbolic cryptography to obtain decision procedures or sound proof methods for program equivalence, information flow, and uniformity. Finally, we evaluate our approach using examples drawn from provable security and from side-channel analysis - for the latter, we focus on the masking countermeasure against differential power analysis. A partial implementation of our approach is integrated in EasyCrypt, a proof assistant for provable security, and in MaskVerif, a fully automated prover for masked implementations.","PeriodicalId":249093,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 32nd Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 32nd Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2019.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Code-based game-playing is a popular methodology for proving security of cryptographic constructions and side-channel countermeasures. This methodology relies on treating cryptographic proofs as an instance of relational program verification (between probabilistic programs), and decomposing the latter into a series of elementary relational program verification steps. In this paper, we develop principled methods for proving such elementary steps for probabilistic programs that operate over finite fields and related algebraic structures. We focus on three essential properties: program equivalence, information flow, and uniformity. We give characterizations of these properties based on deducibility and other notions from symbolic cryptography. We use (sometimes improve) tools from symbolic cryptography to obtain decision procedures or sound proof methods for program equivalence, information flow, and uniformity. Finally, we evaluate our approach using examples drawn from provable security and from side-channel analysis - for the latter, we focus on the masking countermeasure against differential power analysis. A partial implementation of our approach is integrated in EasyCrypt, a proof assistant for provable security, and in MaskVerif, a fully automated prover for masked implementations.
计算密码学证明中的符号方法
基于代码的博弈是一种流行的方法,用于证明密码结构和侧信道对抗的安全性。这种方法依赖于将密码证明作为关系程序验证的实例(在概率程序之间),并将后者分解为一系列基本关系程序验证步骤。在本文中,我们发展了证明在有限域和相关代数结构上运行的概率规划的这些基本步骤的原则方法。我们关注三个基本属性:程序等价性、信息流和一致性。我们基于可演绎性和符号密码学中的其他概念给出了这些性质的表征。我们使用(有时改进)符号密码学的工具来获得程序等价、信息流和一致性的决策过程或可靠方法。最后,我们使用从可证明的安全性和从侧信道分析中提取的示例来评估我们的方法-对于后者,我们专注于针对差分功率分析的屏蔽对策。我们的方法的部分实现集成在EasyCrypt(可证明安全性的证明助手)和MaskVerif(用于掩码实现的全自动证明器)中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信