Integrating Direct and Reverse Logistics in a “Living Lab” Context: Evaluating Stakeholder Acceptability and the Potential of Gamification to Foster Sustainable Urban Freight Transport

V. Gatta, E. Marcucci, M. Le Pira, Andrea Ciccorelli
{"title":"Integrating Direct and Reverse Logistics in a “Living Lab” Context: Evaluating Stakeholder Acceptability and the Potential of Gamification to Foster Sustainable Urban Freight Transport","authors":"V. Gatta, E. Marcucci, M. Le Pira, Andrea Ciccorelli","doi":"10.1002/9781119425472.CH1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter tests stakeholder acceptability and their likely behavior change with respect to innovative solutions for improving urban freight transport efficiency and fostering city sustainability. The proposed solution concerns a new system for integrating direct and reverse logistics in the urban area of Rome with the aim of improving clean waste collection, while also minimizing transport-related CO2 emissions. An ex ante behavioral analysis based on a stated preference survey has been conducted to investigate stakeholder preferences for different scenario configurations associated with recycling, so as to boost the success of the initiative and promote sustainable behavior. Results show that an environmentally friendly transport system and a gamification process associated with recycling are the most important attributes for stakeholders. Scenarios including these two elements are the most effective in terms of the amount of recycled materials and potentially saved CO2. Results of the behavioral analysis are useful to plan the functioning of the proposed solution according to stakeholders’ preferences and pave the way for its upscaling and transferability.","PeriodicalId":240262,"journal":{"name":"City Logistics 3","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City Logistics 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119425472.CH1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This chapter tests stakeholder acceptability and their likely behavior change with respect to innovative solutions for improving urban freight transport efficiency and fostering city sustainability. The proposed solution concerns a new system for integrating direct and reverse logistics in the urban area of Rome with the aim of improving clean waste collection, while also minimizing transport-related CO2 emissions. An ex ante behavioral analysis based on a stated preference survey has been conducted to investigate stakeholder preferences for different scenario configurations associated with recycling, so as to boost the success of the initiative and promote sustainable behavior. Results show that an environmentally friendly transport system and a gamification process associated with recycling are the most important attributes for stakeholders. Scenarios including these two elements are the most effective in terms of the amount of recycled materials and potentially saved CO2. Results of the behavioral analysis are useful to plan the functioning of the proposed solution according to stakeholders’ preferences and pave the way for its upscaling and transferability.
在“生活实验室”背景下整合直接和逆向物流:评估利益相关者的接受程度和游戏化的潜力,以促进可持续的城市货运
本章测试利益相关者的可接受性和他们可能的行为变化,以提高城市货运效率和促进城市可持续发展的创新解决方案。拟议的解决方案涉及在罗马市区整合直接和反向物流的新系统,旨在改善清洁废物收集,同时最大限度地减少与运输相关的二氧化碳排放。基于陈述偏好调查的事前行为分析研究了与回收相关的不同情景配置下利益相关者的偏好,从而促进计划的成功实施,促进可持续行为。结果表明,环境友好型运输系统和与回收相关的游戏化过程是利益相关者最重要的属性。包括这两个要素的方案在回收材料的数量和潜在的二氧化碳节约方面是最有效的。行为分析的结果有助于根据利益相关者的偏好规划所提出的解决方案的功能,并为其升级和可转移铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信