{"title":"The potential contribution of conifer plantations to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan","authors":"J. Humphrey, R. Ferris, M. R. Jukes, A. Peace","doi":"10.1080/03746600208685028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The detrimental effects of conifer plantations on open ground habitats have been well catalogued and discussed, but the potential contribution of planted forests to the conservation of woodland biodiversity has not been quantified to the same extent. This quantification is needed urgently to help forest managers fulfil commitments to biodiversity enhancement as outlined in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, the UK Forestry Standard and the UK Woodland Assurance Scheme (UKWAS). Results are presented from a five-year programme of research aimed at obtaining baseline information on biodiversity in planted forests and evaluating the contribution of planted forests to the conservation of native flora and fauna. Fifty-two plots were surveyed in total, covering a range of different tree crops (Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L., Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr., Norway spruce Picea abies L. and Corsican pine Pinus nigra var maritima (Aitón) Melville) and stand ages (pre-thicket, mid-rotation, mature and over-mature) in three contrasting bioclimatic zones (upland, foothills and lowlands) throughout Britain. Additional plots were established in semi-natural woodland to allow comparisons between the biodiversity of plantations and native stands. Over 2000 species were recorded in total, including 45 Red Data Book species. Planted stands had similar or richer fungal and invertebrate communities to those of the native stands but poorer lichen and vascular plant communities. The latter were strongly affected by shading, dense, mid-rotation Sitka spruce stands having the lowest species counts. In contrast, these stands had a high diversity of mycorrhizal fungi, including a number of rare and threatened species normally associated with native pine wood. Bryophyte species-richness was related more to climate than woodland type, with the wetter upland spruce and native oak stands having the most diverse communities. Compared to the younger planted stands, over-mature planted stands had a higher proportion of species characteristic of semi-natural woodland stands. This related to greater structural diversity and higher deadwood volumes in the over-mature stands. It is concluded that conifer plantations make a positive contribution to biodiversity conservation in the UK and hence to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. No single stand or crop type provides ‘optimal’ conditions for biodiversity, but the habitat value of plantations could be enhanced by increasing the area managed under alternative systems to clear-felling, such as ‘continuous cover’ and/or non-intervention natural reserves.","PeriodicalId":365547,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Journal of Scotland","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Journal of Scotland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03746600208685028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
Abstract
Summary The detrimental effects of conifer plantations on open ground habitats have been well catalogued and discussed, but the potential contribution of planted forests to the conservation of woodland biodiversity has not been quantified to the same extent. This quantification is needed urgently to help forest managers fulfil commitments to biodiversity enhancement as outlined in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, the UK Forestry Standard and the UK Woodland Assurance Scheme (UKWAS). Results are presented from a five-year programme of research aimed at obtaining baseline information on biodiversity in planted forests and evaluating the contribution of planted forests to the conservation of native flora and fauna. Fifty-two plots were surveyed in total, covering a range of different tree crops (Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L., Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr., Norway spruce Picea abies L. and Corsican pine Pinus nigra var maritima (Aitón) Melville) and stand ages (pre-thicket, mid-rotation, mature and over-mature) in three contrasting bioclimatic zones (upland, foothills and lowlands) throughout Britain. Additional plots were established in semi-natural woodland to allow comparisons between the biodiversity of plantations and native stands. Over 2000 species were recorded in total, including 45 Red Data Book species. Planted stands had similar or richer fungal and invertebrate communities to those of the native stands but poorer lichen and vascular plant communities. The latter were strongly affected by shading, dense, mid-rotation Sitka spruce stands having the lowest species counts. In contrast, these stands had a high diversity of mycorrhizal fungi, including a number of rare and threatened species normally associated with native pine wood. Bryophyte species-richness was related more to climate than woodland type, with the wetter upland spruce and native oak stands having the most diverse communities. Compared to the younger planted stands, over-mature planted stands had a higher proportion of species characteristic of semi-natural woodland stands. This related to greater structural diversity and higher deadwood volumes in the over-mature stands. It is concluded that conifer plantations make a positive contribution to biodiversity conservation in the UK and hence to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. No single stand or crop type provides ‘optimal’ conditions for biodiversity, but the habitat value of plantations could be enhanced by increasing the area managed under alternative systems to clear-felling, such as ‘continuous cover’ and/or non-intervention natural reserves.
针叶林对开阔地生境的有害影响已经被很好地分类和讨论,但人工林对林地生物多样性保护的潜在贡献尚未得到同样程度的量化。为了帮助森林管理者履行在英国生物多样性行动计划、英国林业标准和英国林地保证计划(UKWAS)中概述的加强生物多样性的承诺,迫切需要这种量化。本文介绍了一个五年研究方案的结果,该方案旨在获得关于人工林生物多样性的基线资料,并评价人工林对保护本地动植物群的贡献。共调查了52个样地,覆盖了一系列不同的乔木作物(苏格兰松、锡特卡云杉、云杉)。卡尔。在整个英国的三个不同的生物气候带(高地、丘陵和低地)中,云杉、云杉和科西嘉松(Aitón)和黑松(Pinus nigra var maritima)和林龄(前灌丛、中轮作、成熟和过成熟)。在半自然林地中建立了额外的地块,以便比较人工林和原生林分的生物多样性。共录得超过2000个物种,包括45个红皮书物种。人工林的真菌和无脊椎动物群落与原生林分相似或更丰富,但地衣和维管植物群落较差。后者受遮荫、密集、中轮伐的锡特卡云杉林分的影响较大,其物种数量最少。相比之下,这些林分菌根真菌的多样性很高,包括一些通常与本地松木有关的稀有和受威胁物种。苔藓植物物种丰富度与气候的关系大于与林地类型的关系,其中湿润的旱地云杉和原生栎林的群落多样性最大。与幼龄人工林相比,过成熟人工林具有半自然林分特征的物种比例更高。这与过成熟林分的结构多样性和更高的枯木量有关。结论是针叶林对英国生物多样性保护做出了积极的贡献,因此对英国生物多样性行动计划做出了积极的贡献。没有单一的林分或作物类型能够为生物多样性提供“最佳”条件,但是通过增加在“连续覆盖”和/或不干预自然保护区等替代系统下管理的面积,可以提高人工林的栖息地价值。