A Theoretical Conceptualization of the Hidden Curriculum in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century

Dejan Hozjan
{"title":"A Theoretical Conceptualization of the Hidden Curriculum in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century","authors":"Dejan Hozjan","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-5799-9.CH002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter is based on the presentation of an understanding of the hidden curriculum in the twentieth century. In this period, four theoretical concepts existed: functionalism, criticism, liberalism, and postmodernism. The starting point for the concept of the hidden curriculum was that of the functionalists. Their understanding of the hidden curriculum was based on the transfer of social norms and values to students. Representatives of criticism, for example, Michael Apple, Michael Young, carried the knowledge of functionalists to the concrete social environment and sought the reasons for social inequality and the role of the hidden curriculum in this. Also, liberal authors, such as John Dewey and Phillip Jackson, dealt with practical issues, being, however, interested in the impact of the hidden curriculum in educational practice. With postmodernists, like Michael Foucault, a critical view of the presented concepts is shown and a warning that the hidden curriculum takes place in a complex social system. This chapter explores a theoretical conceptualization of the hidden curriculum in the second half of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":358895,"journal":{"name":"Implicit Pedagogy for Optimized Learning in Contemporary Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implicit Pedagogy for Optimized Learning in Contemporary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5799-9.CH002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The chapter is based on the presentation of an understanding of the hidden curriculum in the twentieth century. In this period, four theoretical concepts existed: functionalism, criticism, liberalism, and postmodernism. The starting point for the concept of the hidden curriculum was that of the functionalists. Their understanding of the hidden curriculum was based on the transfer of social norms and values to students. Representatives of criticism, for example, Michael Apple, Michael Young, carried the knowledge of functionalists to the concrete social environment and sought the reasons for social inequality and the role of the hidden curriculum in this. Also, liberal authors, such as John Dewey and Phillip Jackson, dealt with practical issues, being, however, interested in the impact of the hidden curriculum in educational practice. With postmodernists, like Michael Foucault, a critical view of the presented concepts is shown and a warning that the hidden curriculum takes place in a complex social system. This chapter explores a theoretical conceptualization of the hidden curriculum in the second half of the twentieth century.
20世纪下半叶隐性课程的理论构想
这一章是基于对20世纪隐性课程的理解。在这一时期,出现了四个理论概念:功能主义、批评主义、自由主义和后现代主义。隐性课程概念的出发点是功能主义者。他们对隐性课程的理解是基于社会规范和价值观向学生的转移。批评的代表人物,如迈克尔·苹果、迈克尔·杨,将功能主义者的知识带到具体的社会环境中,寻找社会不平等的原因以及隐性课程在其中的作用。此外,自由主义作家,如约翰·杜威和菲利普·杰克逊,处理实际问题,然而,对隐藏课程在教育实践中的影响感兴趣。后现代主义者,如迈克尔·福柯,对所呈现的概念提出了批判的观点,并警告说,隐藏的课程发生在一个复杂的社会系统中。本章探讨了20世纪下半叶隐性课程的理论概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信