Optimal forms of two-pin arches

A. Pournaghshband
{"title":"Optimal forms of two-pin arches","authors":"A. Pournaghshband","doi":"10.33422/7CAU.2018.10.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comprehensive review of the response of two-pin arches including catenary, parabolic and circular form to loading is presented. The effects of form on the arch structural response for static loading and span-toheight ratios (L:h) ranging from 2 to 8 are presented using finite element solution provided by the GSA software. Results have shown that circular arches represent least optimal shape, exhibiting high combined stresses and bending moments, particularly for the L:h ratio of 2 (semi-circular arch). The optimum L:h ratio for a circular rib arch is between 4 and 6, but the stresses that develop in it are still higher than in parabolic or catenary arches. This is with regard to the pure arch behavior for L:h≤5. The minimum of the combined compressive stresses in parabolic and catenary arches are observed at L:h ratio between 2 and 4. The parabolic arch demonstrated lower structural action effects when the uniformly distributed load (UDL) is greater than the self-weight (SW). Overall, the findings demonstrate that the response of 2-pin arch forms to applied loading is critically dependent on the arch form and its shape governed by the L:h ratio.","PeriodicalId":356543,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architectural & Urban Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architectural & Urban Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/7CAU.2018.10.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comprehensive review of the response of two-pin arches including catenary, parabolic and circular form to loading is presented. The effects of form on the arch structural response for static loading and span-toheight ratios (L:h) ranging from 2 to 8 are presented using finite element solution provided by the GSA software. Results have shown that circular arches represent least optimal shape, exhibiting high combined stresses and bending moments, particularly for the L:h ratio of 2 (semi-circular arch). The optimum L:h ratio for a circular rib arch is between 4 and 6, but the stresses that develop in it are still higher than in parabolic or catenary arches. This is with regard to the pure arch behavior for L:h≤5. The minimum of the combined compressive stresses in parabolic and catenary arches are observed at L:h ratio between 2 and 4. The parabolic arch demonstrated lower structural action effects when the uniformly distributed load (UDL) is greater than the self-weight (SW). Overall, the findings demonstrate that the response of 2-pin arch forms to applied loading is critically dependent on the arch form and its shape governed by the L:h ratio.
两针拱的最佳形式
对两针拱的响应进行了全面的综述,包括悬链线、抛物线形和圆弧形。利用GSA软件提供的有限元解,给出了静载和跨高比(L:h)在2 ~ 8范围内形式对拱结构响应的影响。结果表明,圆拱是最不理想的形状,具有较高的综合应力和弯矩,特别是对于L:h比为2(半圆拱)。圆形肋拱的最佳L:h比在4到6之间,但其产生的应力仍然高于抛物线或悬链线拱。这是关于L:h≤5的纯拱行为。当L:h比在2和4之间时,抛物线和悬链线拱的组合压应力最小。当均布荷载(UDL)大于自重(SW)时,抛物线拱的结构作用效应较低。总体而言,研究结果表明,2针拱形式对施加载荷的响应严重依赖于拱形式及其形状由L:h比控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信