Emily Dickinson Thinking

H. Vendler
{"title":"Emily Dickinson Thinking","authors":"H. Vendler","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvk12q8k.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is natural that Emily Dickinson should come to mind when one reflects on the evidence for thinking in poetry. Her work has been called metaphysical, philosophical, theological. Vocabularies have been invented to describe her style of thinking-its cryptic ellipses, its compression, its enigmatic subjects, its absent centers, and its abstractions. These qualities indeed are her \"carbonates\"-the residue of the fire that preceded them: \"Ashes denote that Fire was\" [1097; 1865].' But equally intrinsic to her verse is Dickinson's invention of structures that mimic the structure of life as she at any moment conceives it. By those structures she channels our reactions, adjusts our pace to hers, and molds our thinking after her own. Any detailed assertions about her work must be partial ones in view of the almost 1800 poems she composed. Nonetheless, I believe there is something to be said about her thinking as she invents ways to plot temporality.' The larger ideas in Dickinson are not recondite ones: She satirizes received religious thought, while retaining its metaphysical dimension and much of its compensatory solace; she continues the European lyric tradition of an erotic adoration coming to grief-, and she dwells much on nature's appearances, death's certainty, and an uncertain immortality. If it is not Dickinson's themes that determine her style of thinking, what does? Her well-described grammatical, syntactical, and metaphorical idiosyncrasies certainly play an important role in conveying her style of thought to us, but to understand her imaginative thinking we also need to perceive how, in her poems, over time, she altered \"normal\" temporal organization. I take for granted the usual critical account, derived from the poetry, of Dickinson's emotional crises, in which a soul of intense sensitivity, hoping to find stability in religion or love, is brought to grief by some unidentifiable calamity, sometimes represented as an inner death, which leads almost to madness. After each such crisis, she experiences a long aftermath' marked by new traumas, punctuated by forms of denial, stoicism, and regressive idealization. I will be paying particular attention to how Dickinson orders the inner structure of her poems to represent the way such life-events reshape a person's conception of serial existence itself Dickinson's original and \"natural\" style of thinking about serial plot-by which I mean a plot of events in chronological succession-- aimed at a temporal exhaustiveness: Her poems unscrolled, like her sun, 'a ribbon at a time,\" and wished to project, by displaying one \"ribbon\" after another, a complete coverage of temporal experience from beginning to end. Her early poems tend to believe not only that all roads have an end, but also that \"all roads\" have \"A `Clearings at the end,\" as she says in the 1859 poem \"My Wheel is in the dark\" [61]. En route to the denouement at the clearing, the poem strings out experience phase by phase, aspiring to leave no gaps in event or perception before arriving at the end of the sequence. The 1861 poem \"I'll tell you how the Sun rose - \" [204] generates four such \"ribbons,\" each characteristically possessing a strong active verb: The Steeples swam in Amethyst! The news like squirrels ran! The hills untied their Bonnets! The Bobolinks begun! Dickinson paid out her successive ribbons of such verbs again in her 1862 poem on the locomotive: \"I like to see it lap the Miles / And lick the Valleys up,\" [383].4 Because the train is said to complain \"In horrid - hooting stanza\" we can see this early exercise as an ars poetica: \"I like to see it do X and Y . . . And then . . . And then ... And then... Then ... And ... Then.\" The poet's work of thinking fills up with serial incidents the extended journey of the train, just as it had filled up the rising of the sun with serial \"ribbons.\" In each case, the impression is given that all of the manifest phenomena have been noted, since the rising of the sun is followed in the poem by its setting, and the beginning of the trains journey is completed when it stops \"At its own stable door. …","PeriodicalId":429219,"journal":{"name":"Parnassus-poetry in Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parnassus-poetry in Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12q8k.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is natural that Emily Dickinson should come to mind when one reflects on the evidence for thinking in poetry. Her work has been called metaphysical, philosophical, theological. Vocabularies have been invented to describe her style of thinking-its cryptic ellipses, its compression, its enigmatic subjects, its absent centers, and its abstractions. These qualities indeed are her "carbonates"-the residue of the fire that preceded them: "Ashes denote that Fire was" [1097; 1865].' But equally intrinsic to her verse is Dickinson's invention of structures that mimic the structure of life as she at any moment conceives it. By those structures she channels our reactions, adjusts our pace to hers, and molds our thinking after her own. Any detailed assertions about her work must be partial ones in view of the almost 1800 poems she composed. Nonetheless, I believe there is something to be said about her thinking as she invents ways to plot temporality.' The larger ideas in Dickinson are not recondite ones: She satirizes received religious thought, while retaining its metaphysical dimension and much of its compensatory solace; she continues the European lyric tradition of an erotic adoration coming to grief-, and she dwells much on nature's appearances, death's certainty, and an uncertain immortality. If it is not Dickinson's themes that determine her style of thinking, what does? Her well-described grammatical, syntactical, and metaphorical idiosyncrasies certainly play an important role in conveying her style of thought to us, but to understand her imaginative thinking we also need to perceive how, in her poems, over time, she altered "normal" temporal organization. I take for granted the usual critical account, derived from the poetry, of Dickinson's emotional crises, in which a soul of intense sensitivity, hoping to find stability in religion or love, is brought to grief by some unidentifiable calamity, sometimes represented as an inner death, which leads almost to madness. After each such crisis, she experiences a long aftermath' marked by new traumas, punctuated by forms of denial, stoicism, and regressive idealization. I will be paying particular attention to how Dickinson orders the inner structure of her poems to represent the way such life-events reshape a person's conception of serial existence itself Dickinson's original and "natural" style of thinking about serial plot-by which I mean a plot of events in chronological succession-- aimed at a temporal exhaustiveness: Her poems unscrolled, like her sun, 'a ribbon at a time," and wished to project, by displaying one "ribbon" after another, a complete coverage of temporal experience from beginning to end. Her early poems tend to believe not only that all roads have an end, but also that "all roads" have "A `Clearings at the end," as she says in the 1859 poem "My Wheel is in the dark" [61]. En route to the denouement at the clearing, the poem strings out experience phase by phase, aspiring to leave no gaps in event or perception before arriving at the end of the sequence. The 1861 poem "I'll tell you how the Sun rose - " [204] generates four such "ribbons," each characteristically possessing a strong active verb: The Steeples swam in Amethyst! The news like squirrels ran! The hills untied their Bonnets! The Bobolinks begun! Dickinson paid out her successive ribbons of such verbs again in her 1862 poem on the locomotive: "I like to see it lap the Miles / And lick the Valleys up," [383].4 Because the train is said to complain "In horrid - hooting stanza" we can see this early exercise as an ars poetica: "I like to see it do X and Y . . . And then . . . And then ... And then... Then ... And ... Then." The poet's work of thinking fills up with serial incidents the extended journey of the train, just as it had filled up the rising of the sun with serial "ribbons." In each case, the impression is given that all of the manifest phenomena have been noted, since the rising of the sun is followed in the poem by its setting, and the beginning of the trains journey is completed when it stops "At its own stable door. …
艾米莉·狄金森的思考
当人们思考诗歌中思考的证据时,很自然地会想到艾米莉·狄金森。她的作品被称为形而上的,哲学的,神学的。人们发明了许多词汇来描述她的思维方式——隐晦的省略、压缩、神秘的主题、缺失的中心和抽象。这些品质确实是她的“碳酸盐”——在它们之前的火的残余:“灰烬表示火是”[1097;1865]。但狄金森诗歌中同样固有的是她对结构的发明,这些结构模仿了她在任何时候所想象的生活结构。通过这些结构,她引导我们的反应,调整我们的节奏以适应她的节奏,并按照她自己的方式塑造我们的思维。鉴于她创作了近1800首诗,任何对她作品的详细评价都是片面的。尽管如此,我相信她的想法还是有一些值得称道的,因为她发明了一些方法来描绘时间性。”狄金森作品中更大的思想并不深奥:她讽刺了公认的宗教思想,同时保留了其形而上的维度和许多补给性的安慰;她延续了欧洲的抒情传统,情爱的崇拜走向悲伤,她详述了自然的表象,死亡的确定性,以及不确定的不朽。如果不是狄金森的主题决定了她的思维方式,那么是什么决定了她的思维方式呢?她精心描述的语法、句法和隐喻特质,无疑在向我们传达她的思想风格方面发挥了重要作用,但要理解她富有想象力的思维,我们还需要认识到,在她的诗歌中,随着时间的推移,她是如何改变“正常”的时间组织的。我想当然地认为,对狄金森情感危机的批判通常来自诗歌,其中一个强烈敏感的灵魂,希望在宗教或爱情中找到稳定,被某种无法辨认的灾难带来悲伤,有时表现为内心的死亡,几乎导致疯狂。在每一次这样的危机之后,她都会经历一段漫长的后遗症,以新的创伤为标志,被各种形式的否认、坚忍和倒退的理想化所打断。我将特别关注狄金森如何安排她的诗歌的内部结构,以表现这些生活事件如何重塑一个人对系列存在本身的概念。狄金森对系列情节的思考风格是原创的、“自然的”——我指的是按时间顺序连续的事件情节——旨在使时间详尽:她的诗像她的太阳一样,“一次一条丝带”展开,并希望通过展示一条又一条“丝带”,从头到尾全面覆盖时间体验。她早期的诗歌倾向于相信,不仅所有的道路都有尽头,而且“所有的道路”都有“A’Clearings in the end”,正如她在1859年的诗《我的车轮在黑暗中》(My Wheel is in the dark)中所说的那样[61]。在通往空地上的结局的路上,这首诗将经历一个阶段一个阶段地串联起来,希望在到达序列的结尾之前,在事件或感知上没有留下任何空白。1861年的那首诗“我会告诉你太阳是如何升起的”[204]产生了四条这样的“丝带”,每一条都有一个强烈的主动动词:尖塔在紫水晶中游泳!消息像松鼠一样跑了!群山解开了它们的帽子!波波link开始了!狄金森在1862年的诗《在火车头上》中再次用这类动词连成了丝带:“我喜欢看它掠过英里/舔舐山谷,”[383]因为据说火车在“可怕的咆哮节”中抱怨,我们可以把这个早期的练习看作是一种诗歌:“我喜欢看它做X和Y……”然后……然后……然后……然后……和…然后。”诗人的思想作品在火车的漫长旅程中充满了一连串的事件,就像它在太阳的升起中充满了一连串的“丝带”一样。在每一种情况下,给人的印象都是,所有明显的现象都被注意到了,因为在诗中,太阳升起之后是它的落山,当火车停在“自己的马厩门口”时,它的旅程就结束了。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信