Sam Grimwood, K. Stuart, R. Browning, Thea Winn-Reed, E. Bidmead
{"title":"The perception of biopsychosocial impacts of COVID-19 during lockdown restrictions over time in the UK – a mixed methods study","authors":"Sam Grimwood, K. Stuart, R. Browning, Thea Winn-Reed, E. Bidmead","doi":"10.47108/JIDHEALTH.VOL4.ISSSPECIAL2.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted the health of individuals physically, mentally, and socially. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of this impact across the pandemic from a biopsychosocial stance. \nMethods: A survey created by the research team was employed between November 2020 and February 2021 across social media, relevant organizations, and networks. The survey incorporated 5-time points across the different stages of the pandemic, covering biological, psychological, and social. There were 5 items for each survey (Very Positive affect to Very Negative affect), and analysis was undertaken using SPSS version 16. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric Friedman and Wilcoxon Tests, as well as correlations between the three domains, were implemented. \nResults: This study included 164 participants (77.0% female and 35.0% male) across 24 out of 38 counties in the UK. The impact of COVID-19 on biological domain was significant across the five data points χ2(4) = 63.99, p < 0.001, psychological χ2(4) = 118.939, p <0.001 and socially χ2(4) = 186.43, p <0.001. Between the 5 data points, 4 out of 5 had a negative impact, however between the first stage of lockdown and the easing of restrictions, findings for biological (Z=-2.35, p <0.05), psychological (Z=-6.61, p < 0.001), and socially (Z = -8.61, p <0.001) were positive. Negative correlations between the three domains across the pandemic are apparent, but in later stages, the biological domain had a positive correlation r = 0.52, p < 0.001. \nConclusion: The data shows a negative impact from the self-reported perception of wellbeing from a biopsychosocial stance over time, as well as perceiving the three domains to interact negatively. To address these biopsychosocial issues, the research implies a place-based integrated recovery effort is needed, addressing biological, psychological, and social issues simultaneously. Further research should investigate biopsychosocial health among a more generalizable population.","PeriodicalId":365684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ideas in Health","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ideas in Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47108/JIDHEALTH.VOL4.ISSSPECIAL2.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted the health of individuals physically, mentally, and socially. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of this impact across the pandemic from a biopsychosocial stance.
Methods: A survey created by the research team was employed between November 2020 and February 2021 across social media, relevant organizations, and networks. The survey incorporated 5-time points across the different stages of the pandemic, covering biological, psychological, and social. There were 5 items for each survey (Very Positive affect to Very Negative affect), and analysis was undertaken using SPSS version 16. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric Friedman and Wilcoxon Tests, as well as correlations between the three domains, were implemented.
Results: This study included 164 participants (77.0% female and 35.0% male) across 24 out of 38 counties in the UK. The impact of COVID-19 on biological domain was significant across the five data points χ2(4) = 63.99, p < 0.001, psychological χ2(4) = 118.939, p <0.001 and socially χ2(4) = 186.43, p <0.001. Between the 5 data points, 4 out of 5 had a negative impact, however between the first stage of lockdown and the easing of restrictions, findings for biological (Z=-2.35, p <0.05), psychological (Z=-6.61, p < 0.001), and socially (Z = -8.61, p <0.001) were positive. Negative correlations between the three domains across the pandemic are apparent, but in later stages, the biological domain had a positive correlation r = 0.52, p < 0.001.
Conclusion: The data shows a negative impact from the self-reported perception of wellbeing from a biopsychosocial stance over time, as well as perceiving the three domains to interact negatively. To address these biopsychosocial issues, the research implies a place-based integrated recovery effort is needed, addressing biological, psychological, and social issues simultaneously. Further research should investigate biopsychosocial health among a more generalizable population.
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对个体的身体、心理和社会健康产生了深刻影响。本研究旨在从生物心理社会角度更深入地了解这种影响。方法:研究小组在2020年11月至2021年2月期间在社交媒体、相关组织和网络上进行了一项调查。该调查纳入了大流行不同阶段的5个时间点,涵盖生物、心理和社会。每个调查有5个项目(Very Positive affect到Very Negative affect),使用SPSS version 16进行分析。描述性统计和非参数Friedman和Wilcoxon检验,以及三个领域之间的相关性进行了实施。结果:这项研究包括164名参与者(77.0%的女性和35.0%的男性),来自英国38个县中的24个县。新冠肺炎对生物领域的影响在5个数据点上均有统计学意义(χ2(4) = 63.99, p <0.001),心理χ2(4) = 118.939, p <0.001),社会χ2(4) = 186.43, p <0.001)。在5个数据点之间,5个数据点中有4个有负面影响,但在封锁的第一阶段和放松限制之间,生物(Z=-2.35, p <0.05)、心理(Z=-6.61, p <0.001)和社会(Z= -8.61, p <0.001)的结果是积极的。在大流行期间,这三个领域之间存在明显的负相关,但在后期阶段,生物领域存在正相关(r = 0.52, p < 0.001)。结论:数据显示,随着时间的推移,从生物心理社会角度自我报告的幸福感会产生负面影响,并感知到这三个领域的负面相互作用。为了解决这些生物、心理和社会问题,研究表明需要基于地点的综合恢复工作,同时解决生物、心理和社会问题。进一步的研究应该在更广泛的人群中调查生物心理社会健康。