Money Mules and Tumblers Money Laundering During the Cryptocurrency Era

Sofia del Monaco
{"title":"Money Mules and Tumblers\n Money Laundering During the Cryptocurrency Era","authors":"Sofia del Monaco","doi":"10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Money laundering activities related to the cryptocurrency market have seen an exponential increase over the last fifteen years as a consequence of technological developments and economic distresses, as the 2008 crisis and the 2020 pandemic. This essay will analyse the European Union legislation created in order to tackle this phenomenon, dwelling on the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive and its similarities among international laws. In particular, it will be displayed the importance of intermediaries, such as money mules and mixing services, to ease money laundering and increase the anonymity. In this framework, the European Union finds itself almost powerless: the legality of the virtual currency source is assessed only when entering and exiting in the virtual market and not during in-market transactions as well as a complete lack of legislation on mixing services activities. Therefore, how can the European Union steam the misuse of such intermediaries with ex-ante and ex-post interventions? And, finally, are the European privacy policies so important to outrank the risk related to money laundering activities? This paper shows that one way to prevent cryptocurrency money laundering pullulation is launching sensitization and awareness programmes since young age through educational institutions and, most importantly, a narrower legislation is required, implementing those laws that proved to be effective in other countries, in defiance of privacy policies.","PeriodicalId":204526,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche giuridiche","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche giuridiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Money laundering activities related to the cryptocurrency market have seen an exponential increase over the last fifteen years as a consequence of technological developments and economic distresses, as the 2008 crisis and the 2020 pandemic. This essay will analyse the European Union legislation created in order to tackle this phenomenon, dwelling on the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive and its similarities among international laws. In particular, it will be displayed the importance of intermediaries, such as money mules and mixing services, to ease money laundering and increase the anonymity. In this framework, the European Union finds itself almost powerless: the legality of the virtual currency source is assessed only when entering and exiting in the virtual market and not during in-market transactions as well as a complete lack of legislation on mixing services activities. Therefore, how can the European Union steam the misuse of such intermediaries with ex-ante and ex-post interventions? And, finally, are the European privacy policies so important to outrank the risk related to money laundering activities? This paper shows that one way to prevent cryptocurrency money laundering pullulation is launching sensitization and awareness programmes since young age through educational institutions and, most importantly, a narrower legislation is required, implementing those laws that proved to be effective in other countries, in defiance of privacy policies.
加密货币时代的“钱骡子”和“不倒翁”洗钱
由于技术发展和经济困境,例如2008年的危机和2020年的大流行,与加密货币市场相关的洗钱活动在过去15年中呈指数级增长。本文将分析欧盟为解决这一现象而制定的立法,着重讨论第五项反洗钱指令及其在国际法中的相似之处。特别是,它将显示中介机构的重要性,例如钱骡子和混合服务,以减轻洗钱和增加匿名性。在这个框架下,欧盟发现自己几乎无能为力:虚拟货币来源的合法性仅在进入和退出虚拟市场时进行评估,而不是在市场交易期间进行评估,并且完全缺乏关于混合服务活动的立法。因此,欧盟如何通过事前和事后干预来遏制这些中介机构的滥用?最后,欧洲隐私政策的重要性是否超过了与洗钱活动相关的风险?本文表明,防止加密货币洗钱人口激增的一种方法是通过教育机构从小就启动敏感和意识计划,最重要的是,需要更狭窄的立法,实施那些在其他国家被证明有效的法律,而不顾隐私政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信