Canadian Legal Ethics: A Subject in Search of Scholarship

A. Dodek
{"title":"Canadian Legal Ethics: A Subject in Search of Scholarship","authors":"A. Dodek","doi":"10.2307/826036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2000, Adam Dodek surveyed the terrain of Canadian legal ethics and his report was bleak. Few Canadian law schools were offering courses in the subject and the legal scholarship in the area was sparse. Until the 1990s, there was only a single book on Canadian legal ethics. In the 1990s, however, a modest increase in interest in legal ethics was spurred due to the revision of the Canadian Bar Association's Code of Professional Conduct in 1987 and the Supreme Court of Canada's path breaking decision in Martin v. Gray dealing with conflicts of interest. The author describes a \"first generation of scholarship\" in Canadian legal ethics characterized which is largely descriptive rather than analytical and focuses on the ethical codes. The possibility of a \"second generation\" is reviewed positively by the author, welcomed by the publication of Allan Hutchinson's book Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, which the author terms \"the true breakthrough in the scholarship of legal ethics in Canada\" because it was the first monograph in Canada to apply a critical analysis to the core issues of legal ethics. Dodek laments the dearth of empirical research on the legal profession in Canada and concomitant Canadian tendency to rely on American and British scholarship. He reviews several recent British works in the area as providing examples of where the scholarship of Canadian legal ethics can go. The article ends with a challenge to the Canadian legal establishment to begin to take legal ethics seriously.","PeriodicalId":261746,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Canadian Law - International (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Canadian Law - International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/826036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In 2000, Adam Dodek surveyed the terrain of Canadian legal ethics and his report was bleak. Few Canadian law schools were offering courses in the subject and the legal scholarship in the area was sparse. Until the 1990s, there was only a single book on Canadian legal ethics. In the 1990s, however, a modest increase in interest in legal ethics was spurred due to the revision of the Canadian Bar Association's Code of Professional Conduct in 1987 and the Supreme Court of Canada's path breaking decision in Martin v. Gray dealing with conflicts of interest. The author describes a "first generation of scholarship" in Canadian legal ethics characterized which is largely descriptive rather than analytical and focuses on the ethical codes. The possibility of a "second generation" is reviewed positively by the author, welcomed by the publication of Allan Hutchinson's book Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, which the author terms "the true breakthrough in the scholarship of legal ethics in Canada" because it was the first monograph in Canada to apply a critical analysis to the core issues of legal ethics. Dodek laments the dearth of empirical research on the legal profession in Canada and concomitant Canadian tendency to rely on American and British scholarship. He reviews several recent British works in the area as providing examples of where the scholarship of Canadian legal ethics can go. The article ends with a challenge to the Canadian legal establishment to begin to take legal ethics seriously.
加拿大法律伦理:一个寻求学术研究的课题
2000年,亚当•多德克(Adam Dodek)调查了加拿大法律伦理的现状,他的报告颇为黯淡。很少有加拿大法学院开设这方面的课程,该地区的法律奖学金也很少。直到20世纪90年代,只有一本关于加拿大法律伦理的书。然而,在20世纪90年代,由于1987年加拿大律师协会职业行为准则的修订以及加拿大最高法院在马丁诉格雷案中处理利益冲突的开创性裁决,对法律伦理的兴趣有所增加。作者描述了加拿大法律伦理的“第一代学术”,其特点是主要是描述性而不是分析性的,并侧重于道德准则。作者对“第二代”的可能性进行了积极的评价,并对艾伦·哈钦森的《法律伦理与职业责任》一书的出版表示欢迎,作者将其称为“加拿大法律伦理学术的真正突破”,因为它是加拿大第一部对法律伦理核心问题进行批判性分析的专著。Dodek对缺乏对加拿大法律职业的实证研究以及随之而来的加拿大人依赖美国和英国学术的倾向感到遗憾。他回顾了最近英国在这一领域的几部著作,为加拿大法律伦理研究的发展提供了范例。文章最后对加拿大法律体制开始认真对待法律伦理提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信