QRTest: Automatic Query Reformulation for Information Retrieval Based Regression Test Case Prioritization

Maral Azizi
{"title":"QRTest: Automatic Query Reformulation for Information Retrieval Based Regression Test Case Prioritization","authors":"Maral Azizi","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW52544.2021.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most effective regression testing algorithms have long running times and often require dynamic or static code analysis, making them unsuitable for the modern software development environment where the rate of software delivery could be less than a minute. More recently, some researchers have developed information retrieval-based (IR-based) techniques for prioritizing tests such that the higher similar tests to the code changes have a higher likelihood of finding bugs. A vast majority of these techniques are based on standard term similarity calculation, which can be imprecise. One reason for the low accuracy of these techniques is that the original query often is short, therefore, it does not return the relevant test cases. In such cases, the query needs reformulation. The current state of research lacks methods to increase the quality of the query in the regression testing domain. Our research aims at addressing this problem and we conjecture that enhancing the quality of the queries can improve the performance of IR-based regression test case prioritization (RTP). Our empirical evaluation with six open source programs shows that our approach improves the accuracy of IR-based RTP and increases regression fault detection rate, compared to the common prioritization techniques.","PeriodicalId":371680,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW52544.2021.00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most effective regression testing algorithms have long running times and often require dynamic or static code analysis, making them unsuitable for the modern software development environment where the rate of software delivery could be less than a minute. More recently, some researchers have developed information retrieval-based (IR-based) techniques for prioritizing tests such that the higher similar tests to the code changes have a higher likelihood of finding bugs. A vast majority of these techniques are based on standard term similarity calculation, which can be imprecise. One reason for the low accuracy of these techniques is that the original query often is short, therefore, it does not return the relevant test cases. In such cases, the query needs reformulation. The current state of research lacks methods to increase the quality of the query in the regression testing domain. Our research aims at addressing this problem and we conjecture that enhancing the quality of the queries can improve the performance of IR-based regression test case prioritization (RTP). Our empirical evaluation with six open source programs shows that our approach improves the accuracy of IR-based RTP and increases regression fault detection rate, compared to the common prioritization techniques.
QRTest:基于回归测试用例优先级的信息检索自动查询重构
最有效的回归测试算法具有较长的运行时间,并且通常需要动态或静态代码分析,这使得它们不适合软件交付速度可能少于一分钟的现代软件开发环境。最近,一些研究人员开发了基于信息检索(ir)的技术,用于对测试进行优先级排序,这样,与代码更改相似程度越高的测试发现错误的可能性就越大。这些技术中的绝大多数都是基于标准术语相似度计算,这可能是不精确的。这些技术准确性低的一个原因是原始查询通常很短,因此,它不返回相关的测试用例。在这种情况下,查询需要重新表述。目前的研究状况缺乏提高回归测试领域查询质量的方法。我们的研究旨在解决这个问题,我们推测提高查询的质量可以提高基于ir的回归测试用例优先级(RTP)的性能。我们对六个开源程序的经验评估表明,与常见的优先级技术相比,我们的方法提高了基于ir的RTP的准确性,并增加了回归故障检测率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信