Investigating EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Written Corrective Feedback: A Large-scale Study

Luxin Yang, Lintao Zhang, Chen Li, Kailun Wang, Liyang Fan, Rong Yu
{"title":"Investigating EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Written Corrective Feedback: A Large-scale Study","authors":"Luxin Yang, Lintao Zhang, Chen Li, Kailun Wang, Liyang Fan, Rong Yu","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of studies have examined teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding written corrective feedback (WCF) in recent years. However, the sample size in these previous studies tends to be small. Through questionnaires and teacher interviews, the present study explored the WCF beliefs and practices of 2,012 EFL teachers in Beijing, China. It found that the majority of teachers regarded error correction as a responsibility shared by both teachers and students, and they preferred selective WCF and integrative use of direct and indirect WCF methods. Also, they tended to have confidence in the effectiveness of their WCF. As for their practices, they would mostly underline the errors and point out the types or underline all errors with types indicated. In addition, most teachers would give feedback directly, and the number of teachers for and against delivering feedback on recurring errors seemed to be even. This study indicates the necessity of offering in-service EFL teachers training on WCF.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have examined teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding written corrective feedback (WCF) in recent years. However, the sample size in these previous studies tends to be small. Through questionnaires and teacher interviews, the present study explored the WCF beliefs and practices of 2,012 EFL teachers in Beijing, China. It found that the majority of teachers regarded error correction as a responsibility shared by both teachers and students, and they preferred selective WCF and integrative use of direct and indirect WCF methods. Also, they tended to have confidence in the effectiveness of their WCF. As for their practices, they would mostly underline the errors and point out the types or underline all errors with types indicated. In addition, most teachers would give feedback directly, and the number of teachers for and against delivering feedback on recurring errors seemed to be even. This study indicates the necessity of offering in-service EFL teachers training on WCF.
调查英语教师关于书面纠正反馈的信念和实践:一项大规模研究
近年来,越来越多的研究调查了教师关于书面纠正反馈(WCF)的信念和实践。然而,在这些先前的研究中,样本量往往很小。通过问卷调查和教师访谈,本研究对北京2012名英语教师的WCF信念和实践进行了探讨。研究发现,大多数教师认为纠错是教师和学生共同的责任,他们倾向于选择性的WCF和综合使用直接和间接的WCF方法。此外,他们往往对WCF的有效性有信心。他们的做法大多是在错误处划线并指出类型,或者在所有错误处划线并指出类型。此外,大多数老师会直接给出反馈,支持和反对对反复出现的错误提供反馈的老师的数量似乎是相等的。本研究表明了对在职英语教师进行WCF培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信