Did Brexit change the behaviour of the UK’s financial markets?

Bachar Fakhry
{"title":"Did Brexit change the behaviour of the UK’s financial markets?","authors":"Bachar Fakhry","doi":"10.1453/JEPE.V6I2.1868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The recent UK referendum results and subsequent initiation of Article 50 in the 2007 Lisbon Treaty set in motion the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, acknowledge as Brexit. The result and subsequent action were unprecedented and for many unforeseeable. Apart from the political instability and division of the country, the complicated and long process of Brexit have both economic and financial consequences. With this in mind, we analyse the impact of Brexit on four main British financial markets: Equity, Foreign Exchange, Gold and Sovereign Debt; using daily data. We extendthe variance bound test proposed by Fakhry & Richter (2018) underpinned by an asymmetrical C-GARCH-m model of volatility. Unlike many in the past, we placed the emphasis on the stable markets; thus introducing the stable marketpre-condition hypothesis. We analyse the long and short run effects of Brexit on the stability of the UK’s financial market. Our results hint at a certain impact on the UK’s financial market in both the long and short runs on the market stability and hence efficiency. This seems to be dictated by the reaction of market participants to uncertainty surrounding the future of the UK Keywords. Volatility test, Asymmetrical C-GARCH-m, Financial markets, Brexit. JEL. C12, C58, D81, G01, G14, G15, G18, G40.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEPE.V6I2.1868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. The recent UK referendum results and subsequent initiation of Article 50 in the 2007 Lisbon Treaty set in motion the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, acknowledge as Brexit. The result and subsequent action were unprecedented and for many unforeseeable. Apart from the political instability and division of the country, the complicated and long process of Brexit have both economic and financial consequences. With this in mind, we analyse the impact of Brexit on four main British financial markets: Equity, Foreign Exchange, Gold and Sovereign Debt; using daily data. We extendthe variance bound test proposed by Fakhry & Richter (2018) underpinned by an asymmetrical C-GARCH-m model of volatility. Unlike many in the past, we placed the emphasis on the stable markets; thus introducing the stable marketpre-condition hypothesis. We analyse the long and short run effects of Brexit on the stability of the UK’s financial market. Our results hint at a certain impact on the UK’s financial market in both the long and short runs on the market stability and hence efficiency. This seems to be dictated by the reaction of market participants to uncertainty surrounding the future of the UK Keywords. Volatility test, Asymmetrical C-GARCH-m, Financial markets, Brexit. JEL. C12, C58, D81, G01, G14, G15, G18, G40.
英国脱欧是否改变了英国金融市场的行为?
摘要最近的英国公投结果和随后启动的2007年《里斯本条约》第50条启动了英国退出欧盟,被称为英国脱欧。结果和随后的行动是前所未有的,对许多人来说也是不可预见的。除了政治不稳定和国家分裂之外,英国脱欧这一复杂而漫长的过程还会带来经济和金融方面的后果。考虑到这一点,我们分析了英国脱欧对四个主要金融市场的影响:股票、外汇、黄金和主权债务;使用每日数据。我们扩展了Fakhry & Richter(2018)提出的方差界检验,并以不对称的C-GARCH-m波动率模型为基础。与过去的许多基金不同,我们把重点放在稳定的市场上;由此引入稳定市场前提假设。我们分析了英国脱欧对英国金融市场稳定性的长期和短期影响。我们的研究结果暗示了英国金融市场在长期和短期内对市场稳定性和效率的一定影响。这似乎是由市场参与者对英国关键词未来的不确定性的反应所决定的。波动性检验,不对称C-GARCH-m,金融市场,英国脱欧。冻胶。C12, c58, d81, g01, g14, g15, g18, g40。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信