Comparison of routing protocols performance using wireless mesh network simulation and testbed

O. Oki, P. Mudali, J. Oladosu, M. Adigun
{"title":"Comparison of routing protocols performance using wireless mesh network simulation and testbed","authors":"O. Oki, P. Mudali, J. Oladosu, M. Adigun","doi":"10.1109/ICASTECH.2013.6707507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) has received considerable attention as a means to achieve connectivity in community and commercial networks. Protocols at different stack layers have varying effects both on the energy consumption and the general performance of WMN backbone nodes. Previous studies have shown that, simulations have often been used to obtain protocol performance data, but simulation results are at best an abstraction of the real world network performance. Thus, simulations often provide an unrealistic measure of protocol performance and testbed-based studies are proving more realistic. This paper analyses the performance of AODV and OLSR routing protocols in WMN using both simulation and indoor testbed. Although, the simulation and testbed results aligned with each other for Packet delivery ratio and average throughput, but the magnitude of the difference between the two results is wide. However, the simulation result contradicts that of the testbed for the lifetime. Based on the results of this study, we argue that simulation results only give a rough estimate of the real world network performance. Hence, whenever it is feasible, validating simulation results using a testbed is highly recommended in order to improve our understanding of protocol performance.","PeriodicalId":173317,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Adaptive Science and Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Adaptive Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASTECH.2013.6707507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) has received considerable attention as a means to achieve connectivity in community and commercial networks. Protocols at different stack layers have varying effects both on the energy consumption and the general performance of WMN backbone nodes. Previous studies have shown that, simulations have often been used to obtain protocol performance data, but simulation results are at best an abstraction of the real world network performance. Thus, simulations often provide an unrealistic measure of protocol performance and testbed-based studies are proving more realistic. This paper analyses the performance of AODV and OLSR routing protocols in WMN using both simulation and indoor testbed. Although, the simulation and testbed results aligned with each other for Packet delivery ratio and average throughput, but the magnitude of the difference between the two results is wide. However, the simulation result contradicts that of the testbed for the lifetime. Based on the results of this study, we argue that simulation results only give a rough estimate of the real world network performance. Hence, whenever it is feasible, validating simulation results using a testbed is highly recommended in order to improve our understanding of protocol performance.
基于无线网状网络仿真与实验平台的路由协议性能比较
无线网状网络(WMN)作为实现社区和商用网络连通性的一种手段,受到了广泛的关注。不同堆叠层的协议对WMN骨干节点的能耗和总体性能的影响是不同的。以往的研究表明,仿真通常用于获取协议性能数据,但仿真结果充其量是对真实世界网络性能的抽象。因此,模拟通常提供不现实的协议性能度量,而基于测试平台的研究被证明更为现实。本文采用仿真和室内实验两种方法对WMN中AODV和OLSR路由协议的性能进行了分析。虽然在分组传送率和平均吞吐量方面,仿真结果与试验台结果基本一致,但两者之间的差异幅度较大。然而,仿真结果与试验台的寿命结果相矛盾。基于本研究的结果,我们认为仿真结果只给出了对真实世界网络性能的粗略估计。因此,只要可行,强烈建议使用测试平台验证模拟结果,以提高我们对协议性能的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信