Haemodynamic Consequences in Immediate Postoperative Period in Comparison between Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”

Mst Sabiha Banu, Mohammmad Shaddam Hoshain Mondol, Rajat S Das, A. Ali, Ishrat Jahan Shathi, M. Khatun, K. Rahman
{"title":"Haemodynamic Consequences in Immediate Postoperative Period in Comparison between Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”","authors":"Mst Sabiha Banu, Mohammmad Shaddam Hoshain Mondol, Rajat S Das, A. Ali, Ishrat Jahan Shathi, M. Khatun, K. Rahman","doi":"10.3329/JDMC.V28I2.51155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional open cholecystectomy in the management of cholelithiasis. It has several advantages .Pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg positioning causes release of stress hormones and ultimately changes in hemodynamic parameters. Stretching of peritoneum, abdominal wall associated with postoperative pain. So maintenance of haemodynamic stability, immediate postoperative pain control continues to be a major challenge for the anaesthesiologists. Methods: Sample was selected by non-probability sampling technique in two groups distributed asGroup-L (Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, n=30) and Group-O (opencholecystectomy, n=30). Detailed history taking, physical examination and routine lab investigations were done. Approval of the study was obtained by the local Ethical Committee. Post-operative complications, postoperative pain, frequency and pattern of cardiovascular complications, frequency and pattern of respiratory complications were evaluated and compared between thegroups Result: In both groups female were predominant. In this study haemodynamic status (Heart rate, SBP, DBP, MBP) in different phases of anaesthesia, surgery and postoperative follow-up (at 4 hour, 8 hour, and 12th hour) has been observed. Conclusion: This study confirms the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than open technique in terms of attenuation of better haemodynamic stability, better postoperative pain control and less requirement of analgesia.","PeriodicalId":320976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JDMC.V28I2.51155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional open cholecystectomy in the management of cholelithiasis. It has several advantages .Pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg positioning causes release of stress hormones and ultimately changes in hemodynamic parameters. Stretching of peritoneum, abdominal wall associated with postoperative pain. So maintenance of haemodynamic stability, immediate postoperative pain control continues to be a major challenge for the anaesthesiologists. Methods: Sample was selected by non-probability sampling technique in two groups distributed asGroup-L (Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, n=30) and Group-O (opencholecystectomy, n=30). Detailed history taking, physical examination and routine lab investigations were done. Approval of the study was obtained by the local Ethical Committee. Post-operative complications, postoperative pain, frequency and pattern of cardiovascular complications, frequency and pattern of respiratory complications were evaluated and compared between thegroups Result: In both groups female were predominant. In this study haemodynamic status (Heart rate, SBP, DBP, MBP) in different phases of anaesthesia, surgery and postoperative follow-up (at 4 hour, 8 hour, and 12th hour) has been observed. Conclusion: This study confirms the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than open technique in terms of attenuation of better haemodynamic stability, better postoperative pain control and less requirement of analgesia.
开放胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后即刻血流动力学影响的比较
背景:在胆石症的治疗中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为传统开腹胆囊切除术的一种流行选择。它有几个优点:气腹和trendelenburg定位引起应激激素的释放,最终改变血流动力学参数。腹膜、腹壁拉伸与术后疼痛有关。所以维持血流动力学的稳定性,术后疼痛的即时控制仍然是麻醉师面临的主要挑战。方法:采用非概率抽样技术将样本分为l组(腹腔镜胆囊切除术,n=30)和o组(开放胆囊切除术,n=30)。详细的病史记录、体格检查和常规实验室检查。该研究获得了当地伦理委员会的批准。对两组患者术后并发症、术后疼痛、心血管并发症发生频率及类型、呼吸系统并发症发生频率及类型进行比较。结果:两组患者均以女性为主。本研究观察了麻醉、手术和术后随访(4小时、8小时和12小时)不同阶段的血流动力学状态(心率、收缩压、舒张压、MBP)。结论:本研究证实了腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性和安全性,在血流动力学稳定性减弱、术后疼痛控制和镇痛需求减少等方面优于开放技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信