Experimental passive and reactive control of a Laboratory Scale WEC Point Absorber

Bret Bosma, Courtney Beringer, Bryson Robertson
{"title":"Experimental passive and reactive control of a Laboratory Scale WEC Point Absorber","authors":"Bret Bosma, Courtney Beringer, Bryson Robertson","doi":"10.36688/ewtec-2023-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scaled testing is an important and valuable step in the process of determining best practices of WEC development, validating numerical models of WEC systems, and/or preparing for larger scale testing. Validation and verification of numerical models are very important as there are physical phenomena that are hard to numerically model such as non-linear frictional effects. This paper builds on the 2021 EWTEC paper [1] in performing and evaluating experimental testing of the Laboratory Upgrade Point Absorber (LUPA). Since this last paper, LUPA has been fabricated and deployed and an initial characterization has been performed. Particularly passive (damping), and reactive (damping and stiffness) control methodologies are employed in regular waves to characterize and evaluate the mechanical power extracted from the waves. Reactive control allows us to invest energyin the system to get a greater average energy out as compared to damping control. \nThe LUPA project has just finished its first deployment in the Large Wave Flume at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory at Oregon State University as shown in Figure 1. Three modes of operation were tested, namely one body heave only, two body heave only, and six degrees of freedom. The one body heave only mode restricts the motion to linear and vertical and fixes the spar body so that the float is the only body free to move. The two body heave only maintains the vertical linear motion, but unlocks the float such that the float and spar are free to heave. The six degrees of freedom case is a floating moored mode with no restrictions on motion. \nThis paper will focus on comparing passive and reactive control for the one body heave only case and the six degreesof freedom case with preliminary results shown in Figure 2. Regular waves were tested, focusing on a single wave heightand sweeping the wave period. Results will be presented in power (W) units and in capture width (m). Fig. 2. Top shows max power output vs input wave period for one body and two body configurations and just damping and damping and stiffness cases.Take note of differing input wave height. Bottom shows capture width. \nThe LUPA project will provide a valuable testing platform for students and researchers. It will also provide a publicly available open source design and dataset for the research community here: https://github.com/PMECOSU/LUPA. This paper will serve as documentation of the initial testing of the system, providing baseline control results to be compared in future testing.","PeriodicalId":201789,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36688/ewtec-2023-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scaled testing is an important and valuable step in the process of determining best practices of WEC development, validating numerical models of WEC systems, and/or preparing for larger scale testing. Validation and verification of numerical models are very important as there are physical phenomena that are hard to numerically model such as non-linear frictional effects. This paper builds on the 2021 EWTEC paper [1] in performing and evaluating experimental testing of the Laboratory Upgrade Point Absorber (LUPA). Since this last paper, LUPA has been fabricated and deployed and an initial characterization has been performed. Particularly passive (damping), and reactive (damping and stiffness) control methodologies are employed in regular waves to characterize and evaluate the mechanical power extracted from the waves. Reactive control allows us to invest energyin the system to get a greater average energy out as compared to damping control. The LUPA project has just finished its first deployment in the Large Wave Flume at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory at Oregon State University as shown in Figure 1. Three modes of operation were tested, namely one body heave only, two body heave only, and six degrees of freedom. The one body heave only mode restricts the motion to linear and vertical and fixes the spar body so that the float is the only body free to move. The two body heave only maintains the vertical linear motion, but unlocks the float such that the float and spar are free to heave. The six degrees of freedom case is a floating moored mode with no restrictions on motion. This paper will focus on comparing passive and reactive control for the one body heave only case and the six degreesof freedom case with preliminary results shown in Figure 2. Regular waves were tested, focusing on a single wave heightand sweeping the wave period. Results will be presented in power (W) units and in capture width (m). Fig. 2. Top shows max power output vs input wave period for one body and two body configurations and just damping and damping and stiffness cases.Take note of differing input wave height. Bottom shows capture width. The LUPA project will provide a valuable testing platform for students and researchers. It will also provide a publicly available open source design and dataset for the research community here: https://github.com/PMECOSU/LUPA. This paper will serve as documentation of the initial testing of the system, providing baseline control results to be compared in future testing.
实验室规模WEC点吸收器的实验被动和被动控制
在确定WEC开发的最佳实践、验证WEC系统的数值模型和/或准备更大规模的测试过程中,规模化测试是一个重要而有价值的步骤。由于存在非线性摩擦效应等难以数值模拟的物理现象,因此数值模型的验证和验证非常重要。本文建立在2021年EWTEC论文[1]的基础上,对实验室升级点吸收器(LUPA)进行了实验测试和评估。自上一篇论文以来,已经制造和部署了LUPA,并进行了初步表征。特别是被动(阻尼)和被动(阻尼和刚度)控制方法在规则波中使用,以表征和评估从波中提取的机械功率。与阻尼控制相比,无功控制允许我们在系统中投入能量以获得更大的平均能量输出。LUPA项目刚刚在俄勒冈州立大学O.H. Hinsdale波浪研究实验室的大波水槽中完成了第一次部署,如图1所示。测试了三种操作模式,即单体升沉、双体升沉和六自由度。单一体升沉模式将运动限制在直线和垂直方向上,并固定梁体,使浮子成为唯一自由运动的体。两体升沉只保持垂直直线运动,而将浮子解开,使浮子和梁自由升沉。六自由度情况是一种没有运动限制的浮动系泊模式。本文将重点比较单体升沉情况和六自由度情况下的被动控制和被动控制,初步结果如图2所示。对规则波进行了测试,重点关注单个波的高度和波浪周期。结果将以功率(W)单位和捕获宽度(m)表示。顶部显示了单体和双体配置的最大功率输出与输入波周期,以及阻尼和阻尼和刚度情况。注意不同的输入波高。底部显示捕获宽度。LUPA项目将为学生和研究人员提供有价值的测试平台。它还将为研究社区提供公开可用的开源设计和数据集:https://github.com/PMECOSU/LUPA。本文将作为系统初始测试的文档,提供基线控制结果,以便在将来的测试中进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信