RETURN OF COURT FEE IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVING THE APPLICATION WITHOUT CONSIDERATION IN THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE

U. Vorobel
{"title":"RETURN OF COURT FEE IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVING THE APPLICATION WITHOUT CONSIDERATION IN THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE","authors":"U. Vorobel","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-46-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article researches the peculiarities of return of court fees in connection with the completion of a civil case without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration of legal regulation, analyzes the issues of this institute in judicial practice, and provides suggestions for improving its legal regulation. Attention has been drawn to the fact that since the court fee is one of the basic categories of access to justice, and therefore an element of the right of a person to judicial protection enjoyment, and the need to ensure the balance of interests of the state and the individual in regulating the legal basis of court fees payment, the grounds for the application of this procedural institute must be exhaustive and may not be subject to extended interpretation. Based on the comparative analysis of the legal regulation of the return of court fees institute, and in particular the legislative regulation of such grounds for its application as completion of civil proceedings without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration, it was found a legislative tendency to reduce the list of the very grounds for leaving the application without consideration, with the use of which the return of court fees is allowed. Examples of jurisprudence in the field of application of each ground of leaving the application without consideration through the prism of the institute of return of court fees have been given. Attention has been drawn to the fact that although in the process of amending the civil procedural legislation, which took place with the adoption of the Law of Ukraine \"On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts\", such grounds as leaving by the plaintiff (his/her representative) of the courtroom was removed from the \"general list\" of grounds for leaving the application without consideration under Part 1 of Art. 257 CPC of Ukraine, it still exists, because it was left by the legislator in the article governing the consequences of non-appearance at the hearing of the parties (Part 6 of Art. 223 CPC of Ukraine). It has been constituted that item 4 of Part 1 Art. 7 of the Law of Ukraine \"On Court Fees\" provides the opportunity to return the court fee in case of completion of a civil case without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration on all grounds except those that constitute exceptions by law, and in particular the grounds established by items 3, 5 and 9 of Part 1 Art. 257 CPC of Ukraine, as well as Part 6 of Art. 223 CPC of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":331578,"journal":{"name":"Social & Legal Studios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-46-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article researches the peculiarities of return of court fees in connection with the completion of a civil case without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration of legal regulation, analyzes the issues of this institute in judicial practice, and provides suggestions for improving its legal regulation. Attention has been drawn to the fact that since the court fee is one of the basic categories of access to justice, and therefore an element of the right of a person to judicial protection enjoyment, and the need to ensure the balance of interests of the state and the individual in regulating the legal basis of court fees payment, the grounds for the application of this procedural institute must be exhaustive and may not be subject to extended interpretation. Based on the comparative analysis of the legal regulation of the return of court fees institute, and in particular the legislative regulation of such grounds for its application as completion of civil proceedings without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration, it was found a legislative tendency to reduce the list of the very grounds for leaving the application without consideration, with the use of which the return of court fees is allowed. Examples of jurisprudence in the field of application of each ground of leaving the application without consideration through the prism of the institute of return of court fees have been given. Attention has been drawn to the fact that although in the process of amending the civil procedural legislation, which took place with the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts", such grounds as leaving by the plaintiff (his/her representative) of the courtroom was removed from the "general list" of grounds for leaving the application without consideration under Part 1 of Art. 257 CPC of Ukraine, it still exists, because it was left by the legislator in the article governing the consequences of non-appearance at the hearing of the parties (Part 6 of Art. 223 CPC of Ukraine). It has been constituted that item 4 of Part 1 Art. 7 of the Law of Ukraine "On Court Fees" provides the opportunity to return the court fee in case of completion of a civil case without a court judgement in the form of leaving the application without consideration on all grounds except those that constitute exceptions by law, and in particular the grounds established by items 3, 5 and 9 of Part 1 Art. 257 CPC of Ukraine, as well as Part 6 of Art. 223 CPC of Ukraine.
退还与在乌克兰民事诉讼中不予考虑而放弃申请有关的诉讼费
本文研究了未判决民事结案退还诉讼费的特点,即不考虑法律规制而不予受理,分析了该制度在司法实践中存在的问题,并提出了完善其法律规制的建议。的注意力已经被吸引到这一事实,因为法庭费用获得司法的基本范畴之一,因此一个元素的人司法保护的权利享受,和需要确保国家和个人利益的平衡调节诉讼费支付的法律基础,这个程序的理由应用研究所必须详尽,不得扩大解释。通过对退还诉讼费制度的法律规定的比较分析,特别是对其适用理由的立法规定,如在没有法院判决的情况下以不考虑申请的形式完成民事诉讼程序,发现立法倾向于减少不考虑放弃申请的理由清单,允许使用这些理由退还诉讼费。通过退还诉讼费制度的棱镜,给出了在不考虑申请的每个理由的适用领域的法理学例子。提请注意的是,虽然在修正民事诉讼立法的过程中,随着乌克兰“关于修正乌克兰商业诉讼法典、乌克兰民事诉讼法典、乌克兰行政诉讼法典和其他立法法案”的通过而进行,原告(他/她的代表)离开法庭等理由已从根据乌克兰宪法第257条第1部分不审议而离开申请的理由的“一般清单”中删除,但它仍然存在,因为它是立法者在关于当事人不出庭听审的后果的条款中留下的(乌克兰宪法第223条第6部分)。第1部分构成,4项艺术。7乌克兰的法律“诉讼费”提供了机会返回法庭费用的完成没有法院的民事案件审判的形式离开应用程序,而不考虑所有的理由除了那些构成法律例外,特别是项目建立的理由3、5和9的第1部分艺术。257中国共产党的乌克兰,以及第6部分的艺术。223中国共产党的乌克兰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信