Analyzing Common Errors in Differentiating and Integrating Functions as Basis for Supplemental Calculus Learning Tool

A. G. Roman
{"title":"Analyzing Common Errors in Differentiating and Integrating Functions as Basis for Supplemental Calculus Learning Tool","authors":"A. G. Roman","doi":"10.58806/ijirme.2023.v2i7n03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calculus is one of the most interesting fields of Mathematics yet difficult to pass. In this study, the common errors committed by the students were analyzed and categorized based on Newman’s error analysis guide. Using the quantitative research method, 10 Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Mathematics students enrolled in Calculus I and II were purposively chosen. The study hypothesized that no significant effects of the errors committed when classified according to types of errors and math fields to the overall performances in Calculus I and II of the students. Data collected were analyzed and interpreted using Mean Percentage Scores and Structural Equation Modelling. Based on the results, students commit errors mostly in differentiating functions involving logarithms. In terms of integration, students commit errors more on algebraic functions. Based on Newman’s error analysis, errors committed by mathematics major students are categorized into comprehension in both differentiation and integration processes. The result reveals that while students are equipped with the necessary skills needed for the transformation, process, and encoding, comprehension of the pre-requisite concepts should be strengthened and given attention specifically in algebraic and logarithmic functions. Finally, an instructional material addressing the identified common errors was developed.","PeriodicalId":183155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2023.v2i7n03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculus is one of the most interesting fields of Mathematics yet difficult to pass. In this study, the common errors committed by the students were analyzed and categorized based on Newman’s error analysis guide. Using the quantitative research method, 10 Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Mathematics students enrolled in Calculus I and II were purposively chosen. The study hypothesized that no significant effects of the errors committed when classified according to types of errors and math fields to the overall performances in Calculus I and II of the students. Data collected were analyzed and interpreted using Mean Percentage Scores and Structural Equation Modelling. Based on the results, students commit errors mostly in differentiating functions involving logarithms. In terms of integration, students commit errors more on algebraic functions. Based on Newman’s error analysis, errors committed by mathematics major students are categorized into comprehension in both differentiation and integration processes. The result reveals that while students are equipped with the necessary skills needed for the transformation, process, and encoding, comprehension of the pre-requisite concepts should be strengthened and given attention specifically in algebraic and logarithmic functions. Finally, an instructional material addressing the identified common errors was developed.
分析函数求导和积分中的常见错误,作为微积分辅助学习工具的基础
微积分是数学中最有趣但又很难通过的领域之一。在本研究中,根据Newman的错误分析指南,对学生常见的错误进行分析和分类。采用定量研究的方法,有目的地选择了10名中等教育专业数学本科学生就读于微积分I和II。本研究假设,根据错误类型和数学领域进行分类时,所犯错误对学生微积分I和微积分II的整体成绩没有显著影响。收集的数据使用平均百分比评分和结构方程模型进行分析和解释。从结果来看,学生在求导涉及对数的函数时犯的错误最多。在积分方面,学生在代数函数上犯的错误更多。根据Newman的错误分析,数学专业学生在微分和积分过程中所犯的错误分为理解两类。结果表明,虽然学生具备了转换、处理和编码所需的必要技能,但应加强对先决概念的理解,并特别注意代数和对数函数。最后,编写了一份针对常见错误的教学材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信