Analyses of Short-period Array Data Using a Full-wave Green's Function

M. Ohori, H. Morikawa, A. Nobata
{"title":"Analyses of Short-period Array Data Using a Full-wave Green's Function","authors":"M. Ohori, H. Morikawa, A. Nobata","doi":"10.4294/ZISIN.62.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We studied the effect of body waves on short period vertical ground motion based on both a numerical simulation and field array observations. The vertical components generated by the vertical point force within a close distance are targeted throughout the study. Firstly, we carried out a numerical simulation and confirmed that the effect of body waves on the full-wave field was generally limited to a close distance from the source with frequency dependence. In a frequency range lower than 5 Hz and at around the 1st predominant frequency (5.8 Hz), the effect appears beyond a far distance; in a range of about 6 to 10 Hz, it still remains up to 10 m or more; in a range higher than 10 Hz, it almost vanishes. Secondly, we analyzed the observed array data excited by a 30-kg sandbag falling 10, 20, and 40 m from the array center. The array configuration was a circle, 1 m in radius, consisting of seven sensors placed in the center and around the circumference at equal intervals. To obtain a better understanding of the results of the array analyses, simulated array data, based on the Green's functions for the full-wave field and for the Rayleigh wave, was produced and analyzed in the same manner as the observed field array data. The phase velocity results were calculated with three different methods, namely, the spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method, a method based on the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients in the azimuthal direction with respect to the cross spectral amplitude between the center and one of circumferential stations, and a technique which combined these two methods. In the case of an offset of 10 m (Case 1), the detected phase velocities from the observed data and the simulated data on the full-wave field were much lower than the theoretical phase velocity or that from the Rayleigh wave array data in a frequency range of 5 to 10 Hz, suggesting the strong effect of body waves. In the case of an offset of 20 m (Case 2), the estimated phase velocities from the observed data and the two other simulated array data coincided with the theoretical phase velocity, suggesting the weak effect of body waves. We conclude that in order to properly estimate an underground structure from the array measurement data at a close distance from the source, the analytical technique based on the full-wave Green's function should be applied. Taking a look at the choice of analytical methods for the array data, it can be pointed out that for our interest the two methods which use the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients produce higher accuracy compared with the SPAC method in a relatively low frequency range. In addition, the phase velocity results were estimated from the CCA (centerless circular array) method by Cho et al. (2004). The CCA method provided similar accuracy compared with the above two methods based on the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients. The CCA method seems to be applicable to highly directional wave fields located nearby the source.","PeriodicalId":332254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4294/ZISIN.62.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We studied the effect of body waves on short period vertical ground motion based on both a numerical simulation and field array observations. The vertical components generated by the vertical point force within a close distance are targeted throughout the study. Firstly, we carried out a numerical simulation and confirmed that the effect of body waves on the full-wave field was generally limited to a close distance from the source with frequency dependence. In a frequency range lower than 5 Hz and at around the 1st predominant frequency (5.8 Hz), the effect appears beyond a far distance; in a range of about 6 to 10 Hz, it still remains up to 10 m or more; in a range higher than 10 Hz, it almost vanishes. Secondly, we analyzed the observed array data excited by a 30-kg sandbag falling 10, 20, and 40 m from the array center. The array configuration was a circle, 1 m in radius, consisting of seven sensors placed in the center and around the circumference at equal intervals. To obtain a better understanding of the results of the array analyses, simulated array data, based on the Green's functions for the full-wave field and for the Rayleigh wave, was produced and analyzed in the same manner as the observed field array data. The phase velocity results were calculated with three different methods, namely, the spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method, a method based on the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients in the azimuthal direction with respect to the cross spectral amplitude between the center and one of circumferential stations, and a technique which combined these two methods. In the case of an offset of 10 m (Case 1), the detected phase velocities from the observed data and the simulated data on the full-wave field were much lower than the theoretical phase velocity or that from the Rayleigh wave array data in a frequency range of 5 to 10 Hz, suggesting the strong effect of body waves. In the case of an offset of 20 m (Case 2), the estimated phase velocities from the observed data and the two other simulated array data coincided with the theoretical phase velocity, suggesting the weak effect of body waves. We conclude that in order to properly estimate an underground structure from the array measurement data at a close distance from the source, the analytical technique based on the full-wave Green's function should be applied. Taking a look at the choice of analytical methods for the array data, it can be pointed out that for our interest the two methods which use the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients produce higher accuracy compared with the SPAC method in a relatively low frequency range. In addition, the phase velocity results were estimated from the CCA (centerless circular array) method by Cho et al. (2004). The CCA method provided similar accuracy compared with the above two methods based on the spatial 1st Fourier coeffcients. The CCA method seems to be applicable to highly directional wave fields located nearby the source.
用全波格林函数分析短周期阵列数据
在数值模拟和场阵观测的基础上,研究了体波对短周期垂直地面运动的影响。在近距离范围内,垂直点力产生的垂直分量是整个研究的目标。首先,我们进行了数值模拟,证实了体波对全波场的影响一般限制在离震源较近的距离内,且具有频率依赖性。在低于5赫兹的频率范围内,在第一主频率(5.8赫兹)附近,这种效应出现在很远的距离之外;在约6至10赫兹的范围内,它仍然保持高达10米或更高;在高于10赫兹的范围内,它几乎消失。其次,我们分析了在距离阵列中心10、20和40 m处放置30 kg沙袋激发下的观测阵列数据。阵列配置是一个半径为1米的圆,由7个传感器组成,以相等的间隔放置在圆周的中心和周围。为了更好地理解阵列分析的结果,基于Green的全波场函数和瑞利波函数,以与观测到的场阵列数据相同的方式生成和分析了模拟阵列数据。采用空间自相关(SPAC)法、基于空间傅里叶系数在方位方向上相对于中心与周向站之间的交叉频谱幅值的方法以及两种方法相结合的方法计算相速度结果。在偏移10 m的情况下(案例1),在5 ~ 10 Hz的频率范围内,观测数据和模拟数据在全波场上检测到的相速度远低于理论相速度或瑞利波阵列数据的相速度,表明体波的影响较强。在偏移20 m (case 2)的情况下,观测数据和另外两个模拟阵列数据的估计相速度与理论相速度一致,表明体波的影响较弱。我们认为,为了从近距离的阵列测量数据中正确估计地下结构,应采用基于全波格林函数的分析技术。看一下阵列数据分析方法的选择,可以指出,对于我们的兴趣,使用空间第一傅里叶系数的两种方法在相对较低的频率范围内比SPAC方法产生更高的精度。此外,Cho et al.(2004)利用CCA (centerless circular array)方法估算了相速度结果。与上述两种基于空间一阶傅里叶系数的方法相比,CCA方法具有相似的精度。CCA方法似乎适用于位于震源附近的高方向性波场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信