PRINCIPLE OF OPPORTUNISM IN CRIMINAL LAW (ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM AND DE LEGE FERENDA POSTULATES)

Krystyna Patora
{"title":"PRINCIPLE OF OPPORTUNISM IN CRIMINAL LAW (ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM AND DE LEGE FERENDA POSTULATES)","authors":"Krystyna Patora","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.0401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses to what extent the principle of opportunism should be used in Polish criminal law in cases where the extent of the criminal case would justify the limitation of its scope in the proceedings. However, to depart rom the principle of legality, which is binding now, it is necessary to satisfy many conditions as well as to account for the costs of the proceedings, and in many cases, to take into account limitation periods in prosecuting and judging them. It is justifi ed to compare the prosecution and judicial authorities to other entities, despite their specific functions, in terms of effi ciency of actions and the level of a product developed. The article also presents certain solutions adopted in German criminal law to formulate de lege ferenda postulates.\n\n","PeriodicalId":278850,"journal":{"name":"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses to what extent the principle of opportunism should be used in Polish criminal law in cases where the extent of the criminal case would justify the limitation of its scope in the proceedings. However, to depart rom the principle of legality, which is binding now, it is necessary to satisfy many conditions as well as to account for the costs of the proceedings, and in many cases, to take into account limitation periods in prosecuting and judging them. It is justifi ed to compare the prosecution and judicial authorities to other entities, despite their specific functions, in terms of effi ciency of actions and the level of a product developed. The article also presents certain solutions adopted in German criminal law to formulate de lege ferenda postulates.
刑法中的机会主义原则(问题与法律公决假设分析)
本文讨论了在刑事案件的范围足以证明在诉讼中限制其范围是正当的情况下,波兰刑法应在多大程度上使用机会主义原则。但是,要脱离现在具有约束力的合法性原则,就必须满足许多条件,并考虑到诉讼的费用,在许多情况下,还必须考虑到起诉和审判的时效期限。在行动效率和开发的产品水平方面,有理由将起诉和司法当局与其他实体进行比较,尽管它们具有特定的职能。本文还介绍了德国刑法在制定法民公设条件方面所采取的一些解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信