Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)

Abdullah Ayedh, M. Kamaruddin, A. Shaharuddin
{"title":"Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)","authors":"Abdullah Ayedh, M. Kamaruddin, A. Shaharuddin","doi":"10.6007/ijarafms/v9-i4/6844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explain the justification behind the current Shariah screening methodology assessments used by KLSI, which differs from other major Shariah screening methodology around the world. Besides, this study is also attempts to investigate on the intention to entitle Shariah-compliant status by Public Listed Companies (PLCs) in Malaysia. This study employed a series of interviews with five individuals who are involves with KLSI Shariah screening methodology as data collection procedure. Thus, this study found a number of justifications on the reasons behind the current Shariah screening methodology assessments used by KLSI. This includes reasons on the adoption of additional 20% tolerable percentage, additional criteria on corporate image and maslaha (public benefits) and also views on the leniency of current KLSI Shariah screening methodology assessments. Besides, this study also identified several measures to identify the intention to entitle Shariah-compliant status by PLCs. This includes voluntary application, effort of de-listed PLCs to be listed as Shariah-compliant for the following year, impact of Shariah-compliant status especially on the share prices and potential investors, good corporate image on maintaining Shariah-compliant status and the core value of the business. Then, this study also provide several recommendations to be considered for future improvement especially on Shariah screening methodology assessment.","PeriodicalId":120099,"journal":{"name":"Economic Anthropology eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v9-i4/6844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the justification behind the current Shariah screening methodology assessments used by KLSI, which differs from other major Shariah screening methodology around the world. Besides, this study is also attempts to investigate on the intention to entitle Shariah-compliant status by Public Listed Companies (PLCs) in Malaysia. This study employed a series of interviews with five individuals who are involves with KLSI Shariah screening methodology as data collection procedure. Thus, this study found a number of justifications on the reasons behind the current Shariah screening methodology assessments used by KLSI. This includes reasons on the adoption of additional 20% tolerable percentage, additional criteria on corporate image and maslaha (public benefits) and also views on the leniency of current KLSI Shariah screening methodology assessments. Besides, this study also identified several measures to identify the intention to entitle Shariah-compliant status by PLCs. This includes voluntary application, effort of de-listed PLCs to be listed as Shariah-compliant for the following year, impact of Shariah-compliant status especially on the share prices and potential investors, good corporate image on maintaining Shariah-compliant status and the core value of the business. Then, this study also provide several recommendations to be considered for future improvement especially on Shariah screening methodology assessment.
吉隆坡伊斯兰教法指数(KLSI)对现行伊斯兰教法筛选方法的挑战
本研究的目的是解释KLSI目前使用的伊斯兰教法筛选方法评估背后的理由,这与世界上其他主要的伊斯兰教法筛选方法不同。此外,本研究也试图探讨马来西亚上市公司(plc)的合规性意向。本研究采用了一系列的访谈五个人参与KLSI伊斯兰教法筛选方法作为数据收集程序。因此,本研究发现了KLSI目前使用的伊斯兰教法筛选方法评估背后的一些理由。这包括采用额外20%可容忍百分比的原因、企业形象和公共利益的额外标准,以及对目前KLSI伊斯兰教法筛选方法评估的宽容度的看法。此外,本研究还确定了几项措施,以确定plc授予伊斯兰教法合规地位的意图。这包括自愿申请、退市plc在下一年努力成为符合伊斯兰教法的上市公司、符合伊斯兰教法地位的影响,特别是对股价和潜在投资者的影响、保持符合伊斯兰教法地位的良好企业形象和业务的核心价值。然后,本研究还提供了一些建议,以考虑未来的改进,特别是对伊斯兰教法筛选方法的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信