Pour une économie publique hétérodoxe

J. Monnier
{"title":"Pour une économie publique hétérodoxe","authors":"J. Monnier","doi":"10.3166/EJESS.25.7-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis have violently destabilized the economic and financial order and made two collateral victims, professional economists and economic analysis. In effect they failed to forecast this cataclysm and to provide policies for a strong and sustainable growth. During the subsequent debates the fault of orthodoxy has been pointed out. In consequence the question of the determination of an alternative is of crucial importance, particularly in the field of public economics. The first part of the article is devoted to the question of the nature of orthodox economics. The second part deals with the conditions of the emergence of heterodoxy and with the French peculiarity. Finally, the article tries to explain the reasons why public economics have failed after its neoclassical methodological reorientation at the beginning of the seventies.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3166/EJESS.25.7-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The crisis have violently destabilized the economic and financial order and made two collateral victims, professional economists and economic analysis. In effect they failed to forecast this cataclysm and to provide policies for a strong and sustainable growth. During the subsequent debates the fault of orthodoxy has been pointed out. In consequence the question of the determination of an alternative is of crucial importance, particularly in the field of public economics. The first part of the article is devoted to the question of the nature of orthodox economics. The second part deals with the conditions of the emergence of heterodoxy and with the French peculiarity. Finally, the article tries to explain the reasons why public economics have failed after its neoclassical methodological reorientation at the beginning of the seventies.
对于非正统的公共经济
这场危机严重破坏了经济和金融秩序的稳定,并使专业经济学家和经济分析成为两个附带受害者。实际上,他们没能预测到这场灾难,也没能提供政策来实现强劲而可持续的增长。在随后的辩论中,人们指出了正统观念的错误。因此,确定替代方案的问题至关重要,特别是在公共经济学领域。文章的第一部分专门讨论正统经济学的本质问题。第二部分论述了异教产生的条件和法国的特点。最后,本文试图解释公共经济学在70年代初进行新古典方法论的重新定位后失败的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信