{"title":"Analysis of Some Variants of the Anderson Array-Based Queuing Mutual Exclusion Protocol with Model Checking and Graphical Animations","authors":"Yati Phyo, K. Ogata","doi":"10.1109/DSA.2018.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report on case studies in which some variants of Anderson Protocol, an array-based queuing mutual exclusion protocol, have been analyzed with Maude, a rewriting logic-based computer language equipped with many facilities, such as model checking ones, and SMGA, a state machine graphical animation tool. We demonstrate that graphical state images help human users grasp some characteristics owned by each state. We also demonstrate that the divide & conquer approach to liveness model checking under fairness makes it feasible to conduct a liveness model checking under fairness that cannot be otherwise completed in a reasonable amount of time.","PeriodicalId":117496,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSA.2018.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
We report on case studies in which some variants of Anderson Protocol, an array-based queuing mutual exclusion protocol, have been analyzed with Maude, a rewriting logic-based computer language equipped with many facilities, such as model checking ones, and SMGA, a state machine graphical animation tool. We demonstrate that graphical state images help human users grasp some characteristics owned by each state. We also demonstrate that the divide & conquer approach to liveness model checking under fairness makes it feasible to conduct a liveness model checking under fairness that cannot be otherwise completed in a reasonable amount of time.