The Us Corporate Elephant

Alan R. Palmiter
{"title":"The Us Corporate Elephant","authors":"Alan R. Palmiter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.658522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawn from a speech at the opening convocation at two notarial schools in Italy, this is a story of modern US corporate law. Unlike the statist nature of the corporation in many other countries, the nature of the US corporation is essentially private. It is based on state corporate law, chosen by the parties. Federal law, though regulating disclosure to public investors, mostly avoids a role in the management of the corporation. The corporation rules of state law are largely enabling, not mandatory. The parties have a wide latitude in choosing their own structures. The preeminent provider of state law is Delaware, whose preeminence comes from offering a balanced package of legislative responsiveness, legal expertise, judicial expertise and efficiency, comprehensive case law, and assurances of being non-political. Corporate law in the United States provides only basic creditor protections, assuming that most protections will come through markets and contracts. Significant emphasis is placed on fiduciary duties of corporate directors - to the corporation and shareholders. Fiduciary duties are dynamic, adapting to new governance and market circumstances. Also dynamic are other aspects of corporate law, as illustrated by the legislative, administrative and judicial responses to recent corporate and accounting scandals. Some aspects of corporate law, fundamental to the legitimacy of the corporation, remain unaddressed. The role of the corporation in politics, the place of institutional investors in corporate governance, the responsibility of the corporation for social and environmental practices not mandated by law - these are the current questions for corporate law. Will the corporation be up to the task?","PeriodicalId":106641,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.658522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawn from a speech at the opening convocation at two notarial schools in Italy, this is a story of modern US corporate law. Unlike the statist nature of the corporation in many other countries, the nature of the US corporation is essentially private. It is based on state corporate law, chosen by the parties. Federal law, though regulating disclosure to public investors, mostly avoids a role in the management of the corporation. The corporation rules of state law are largely enabling, not mandatory. The parties have a wide latitude in choosing their own structures. The preeminent provider of state law is Delaware, whose preeminence comes from offering a balanced package of legislative responsiveness, legal expertise, judicial expertise and efficiency, comprehensive case law, and assurances of being non-political. Corporate law in the United States provides only basic creditor protections, assuming that most protections will come through markets and contracts. Significant emphasis is placed on fiduciary duties of corporate directors - to the corporation and shareholders. Fiduciary duties are dynamic, adapting to new governance and market circumstances. Also dynamic are other aspects of corporate law, as illustrated by the legislative, administrative and judicial responses to recent corporate and accounting scandals. Some aspects of corporate law, fundamental to the legitimacy of the corporation, remain unaddressed. The role of the corporation in politics, the place of institutional investors in corporate governance, the responsibility of the corporation for social and environmental practices not mandated by law - these are the current questions for corporate law. Will the corporation be up to the task?
美国企业大象
这是一个关于现代美国公司法的故事,摘自意大利两所公证学校开学典礼上的演讲。与许多其他国家公司的中央集权性质不同,美国公司本质上是私有的。它以州公司法为基础,由当事人选择。联邦法律虽然规范了对公众投资者的披露,但大多避免了在公司管理中发挥作用。州法律中的公司规则在很大程度上是授权的,而不是强制性的。各方在选择自己的结构方面有很大的自由度。特拉华州是最杰出的州法提供者,其卓越之处在于提供了一个平衡的立法响应、法律专业知识、司法专业知识和效率、全面的判例法和非政治性保证的一揽子方案。美国的公司法只提供基本的债权人保护,假设大多数保护将通过市场和合同来实现。重点放在公司董事对公司和股东的受托责任上。受托责任是动态的,适应新的治理和市场环境。公司法的其他方面也充满活力,最近的公司和会计丑闻在立法、行政和司法方面的反应就说明了这一点。对公司合法性至关重要的公司法的某些方面仍未得到解决。公司在政治中的作用,机构投资者在公司治理中的地位,公司对法律未规定的社会和环境实践的责任——这些都是公司法当前面临的问题。公司能胜任这项任务吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信