Reasons for abandonment among the modernists (a study through four Sunnahs)

Naif Naseer Al Mansour
{"title":"Reasons for abandonment among the modernists (a study through four Sunnahs)","authors":"Naif Naseer Al Mansour","doi":"10.36772/arid.aijssh.2023.593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, which is considered extracted from the doctoral thesis of the same researcher entitled “The Conditions of the Dispossessed Men Mentioned by Ibn Hajar in his book Taqrib al-Tahdheeb Collected and Study” from Al-Madinah International University in Malaysia: an issue of the hadith sciences related to the challenge to the narrator, which is the issue of the abandoned narrator In the books of the Sunnah, specifically the four well-known Sunan, and mentioned the words of the scholars of Jarh and Ta’deel in these narrators, And clarification of the reasons that led to the abandonment of the narration from them, and their narrations in the four Sunan, and the ruling of the imams on these narrations, the division of the types of those left behind, the introduction to each section with its related definitions, issues related to the term hadith, and the statement of the results of this study from the agreement of the scholars of the wound. The modification is mostly in judging the abandoned narrators, and it provides a list of the narrators who were judged by the scholars to abandon, and the reason for the narrators of the four Sunan narrations about them.","PeriodicalId":385172,"journal":{"name":"ARID International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARID International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36772/arid.aijssh.2023.593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, which is considered extracted from the doctoral thesis of the same researcher entitled “The Conditions of the Dispossessed Men Mentioned by Ibn Hajar in his book Taqrib al-Tahdheeb Collected and Study” from Al-Madinah International University in Malaysia: an issue of the hadith sciences related to the challenge to the narrator, which is the issue of the abandoned narrator In the books of the Sunnah, specifically the four well-known Sunan, and mentioned the words of the scholars of Jarh and Ta’deel in these narrators, And clarification of the reasons that led to the abandonment of the narration from them, and their narrations in the four Sunan, and the ruling of the imams on these narrations, the division of the types of those left behind, the introduction to each section with its related definitions, issues related to the term hadith, and the statement of the results of this study from the agreement of the scholars of the wound. The modification is mostly in judging the abandoned narrators, and it provides a list of the narrators who were judged by the scholars to abandon, and the reason for the narrators of the four Sunan narrations about them.
现代主义者抛弃的原因(通过四个圣训考察)
这项研究被认为摘自同一位研究人员的博士论文,题为“Ibn Hajar在他的《Taqrib al-Tahdheeb收集和研究》一书中提到的被剥夺者的状况”,该论文来自马来西亚麦地那国际大学:穆罕默德言行录科学相关的问题挑战叙述者,即问题放弃了叙述者的Sunnah的书籍,特别是四个著名的苏南,并提到的学者的话说Jarh和Ta 'deel这些叙述者和澄清的原因放弃了他们的叙述,和他们的叙述四苏南,执政党的伊玛目这些解说,那些留下的类型的划分,每个部分的介绍及其相关的定义,与圣训术语相关的问题,以及来自伤口学者协议的本研究结果的陈述。修改主要集中在对被弃叙述者的判断上,并提供了一份被学者判断为被弃叙述者的名单,以及关于他们的四个苏南叙述者的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信