Making sense of UML class model changes by textual difference presentation

ME '12 Pub Date : 2012-10-01 DOI:10.1145/2523599.2523601
H. Störrle
{"title":"Making sense of UML class model changes by textual difference presentation","authors":"H. Störrle","doi":"10.1145/2523599.2523601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the difference between two models, such as different versions of a design, can be difficult. It is a commonly held belief that the best way of presenting a model difference is by using graph or tree-based visualizations. We disagree and present an alternative approach where sets of low-level model differences are abstracted into high-level model differences that lend themselves to being presented textually. The results of preliminary user studies support our claim.","PeriodicalId":200965,"journal":{"name":"ME '12","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ME '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2523599.2523601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Understanding the difference between two models, such as different versions of a design, can be difficult. It is a commonly held belief that the best way of presenting a model difference is by using graph or tree-based visualizations. We disagree and present an alternative approach where sets of low-level model differences are abstracted into high-level model differences that lend themselves to being presented textually. The results of preliminary user studies support our claim.
通过文本差异表示来理解UML类模型的变化
理解两个模型之间的差异(例如设计的不同版本)可能很困难。人们普遍认为,表示模型差异的最佳方式是使用图形或基于树的可视化。我们不同意并提出了一种替代方法,在这种方法中,低级模型差异的集合被抽象为高级模型差异,从而使它们能够以文本形式呈现。初步的用户研究结果支持了我们的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信