The Microbiome of Peri-implantitis Using Next-Generation Sequencing with 16S rRNA Gene: A Systematic Review

Pei-Shiuan Yu Pei-Shiuan Yu, 陳漪紋 Pei-Shiuan Yu
{"title":"The Microbiome of Peri-implantitis Using Next-Generation Sequencing with 16S rRNA Gene: A Systematic Review","authors":"Pei-Shiuan Yu Pei-Shiuan Yu, 陳漪紋 Pei-Shiuan Yu","doi":"10.53106/261634032022090502003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Objective: This study was aimed at systematically reviewing the literature on the microbial profiles of peri-implantitis (PI) as analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods. Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted to find clinical trials published up to November 2021. The inclusion criteria were studies assessing the microbiome of PI by using 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis in otherwise healthy patients. Results: Of 70 potentially eligible articles, data from 12 studies on 636 samples from peri-implant sites and natural tooth sites were included in this study. In 10 out of 12 studies the PI microbiome showed distinct microbial profiles from healthy implants (HI) or periodontitis teeth (PT) or healthy teeth (HT), whereas 2 studies only discussed the difference in smoking and disease severity in PI. The main observed genera were Actinomyces, Campylobacter, Fusobacterium, Mogibacterium, Moraxella, Prevotella, Treponema, and Porphyromonas. Five studies showed higher microbial diversity in PI than HI, whereas 4 studies showed lower microbial diversity in PI than HI, and 2 studies showed similar microbial diversity to HI and PT. One study suggested that microbial diversity in smokers was lower than in non-smokers and one study suggested that disease severity in PI reduced the diversity of the microbiome. Four studies revealed a significant correlation between microbiome composition and clinical parameters, particularly the probing depth. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that increases in peri-implant probing depth are associated with substantial changes in the submucosal microbiome and increasing levels of dysbiosis. The microbial profiles of PI seem distinct in HI, PT, and HT. However, the results for PI-related species and microbial diversity were inconsistent because of the heterogeneity of the study designs.","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This study was aimed at systematically reviewing the literature on the microbial profiles of peri-implantitis (PI) as analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods. Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted to find clinical trials published up to November 2021. The inclusion criteria were studies assessing the microbiome of PI by using 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis in otherwise healthy patients. Results: Of 70 potentially eligible articles, data from 12 studies on 636 samples from peri-implant sites and natural tooth sites were included in this study. In 10 out of 12 studies the PI microbiome showed distinct microbial profiles from healthy implants (HI) or periodontitis teeth (PT) or healthy teeth (HT), whereas 2 studies only discussed the difference in smoking and disease severity in PI. The main observed genera were Actinomyces, Campylobacter, Fusobacterium, Mogibacterium, Moraxella, Prevotella, Treponema, and Porphyromonas. Five studies showed higher microbial diversity in PI than HI, whereas 4 studies showed lower microbial diversity in PI than HI, and 2 studies showed similar microbial diversity to HI and PT. One study suggested that microbial diversity in smokers was lower than in non-smokers and one study suggested that disease severity in PI reduced the diversity of the microbiome. Four studies revealed a significant correlation between microbiome composition and clinical parameters, particularly the probing depth. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that increases in peri-implant probing depth are associated with substantial changes in the submucosal microbiome and increasing levels of dysbiosis. The microbial profiles of PI seem distinct in HI, PT, and HT. However, the results for PI-related species and microbial diversity were inconsistent because of the heterogeneity of the study designs.
利用下一代16S rRNA基因测序研究种植体周围的微生物组:系统综述
摘要:目的:本研究旨在系统回顾利用16S rRNA基因测序方法分析种植体周围炎(PI)微生物谱的文献。方法:对PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行电子检索,查找截至2021年11月发表的临床试验。纳入标准是在其他健康患者中使用16S rRNA基因测序分析评估PI微生物组的研究。结果:在70篇可能符合条件的文章中,本研究纳入了12项研究的数据,涉及种植体周围和天然牙齿部位的636个样本。在12项研究中,有10项研究显示PI微生物组与健康种植体(HI)或牙周炎牙齿(PT)或健康牙齿(HT)有不同的微生物特征,而2项研究仅讨论了PI中吸烟和疾病严重程度的差异。观察到的主要属有放线菌属、弯曲菌属、梭杆菌属、莫吉杆菌属、莫拉菌属、普雷沃菌属、密螺旋体菌属和卟啉单胞菌属。5项研究显示PI的微生物多样性高于HI, 4项研究显示PI的微生物多样性低于HI, 2项研究显示PI的微生物多样性与HI和PT相似。1项研究表明吸烟者的微生物多样性低于不吸烟者,1项研究表明PI的疾病严重程度降低了微生物多样性。四项研究揭示了微生物组组成与临床参数,特别是探测深度之间的显著相关性。结论:本系统综述显示,种植体周围探查深度的增加与粘膜下微生物群的实质性变化和生态失调水平的增加有关。PI的微生物谱在HI, PT和HT中似乎不同。然而,由于研究设计的异质性,pi相关物种和微生物多样性的结果不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信