Stochastic Differential Equation for Approval Ratings and Scoring Systems

Saugata Giri
{"title":"Stochastic Differential Equation for Approval Ratings and Scoring Systems","authors":"Saugata Giri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3108861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback and rating/scoring systems are used almost everywhere nowadays. Generally customers are being asked to rate a product on a scale of 1 to 10, or 1 to 5 or on any other positive real number scale. The average score then would provide for the qualitative assessment of the product. For example Movies would be rated by their viewers and critics alike. The mean or some king of weighted mean of there feedback scores would then become their \"APPROVAL RATING\" or \"AR\" for short. Approval ratings thus are measures of central tendency for approval/disapproval for a product. But these approval ratings keep changing as new feedback data is punched into the system. Hence they are dynamic (stochastic in nature) with their value changing as and when more feedback data keep flowing in. The most simple feedback system is where a customer is just asked whether they liked/disliked a product. The sequence of responses then would look like the output of a coin toss experiment (with heads/approval would be scored as 1 and tails/disapproval would be 0). At any point of time the overall mean would then be reported as the Approval Rating Score. The sequence of all running means, updated with the latest feedback data from customers, would form the \"APPROVAL RATING VECTOR\" or \"ARV\" for short. If we take a look at a sequence of evolution of the approval rating score with newer feedbacks, we would realise that even though we are using the last available data as the latest rating the whole path and the data hidden behind that path is never actually used. In Finance for example a measure called IRR (Internal Rate of Return) would describe the whole yield curve. While IRR is a single number, it is derived by using the information from the whole path followed by the yield curve. Similar mechanism is also present in the field of quantitative finance where the zero coupon bond prices would be calculated from the expected value of the continuous compounding of the rates which could be described by any popular short rate model. The short rate model parameters are calculated by taking in information of whole path of evolution of the interest rate. While the future is predicted by calculating the expectation over all possible future paths that the interest rate could take. The point is that the expectation is taken over the whole path. The prevailing interest rate today is not the only component used for pricing the zero coupon bond. Approval ratings however are just described by the present mean/weighted mean, and do not use the information provided by the path it took to reach to the present value, devoiding us the power to predict its future.","PeriodicalId":103032,"journal":{"name":"OPER: Analytical (Topic)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPER: Analytical (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3108861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feedback and rating/scoring systems are used almost everywhere nowadays. Generally customers are being asked to rate a product on a scale of 1 to 10, or 1 to 5 or on any other positive real number scale. The average score then would provide for the qualitative assessment of the product. For example Movies would be rated by their viewers and critics alike. The mean or some king of weighted mean of there feedback scores would then become their "APPROVAL RATING" or "AR" for short. Approval ratings thus are measures of central tendency for approval/disapproval for a product. But these approval ratings keep changing as new feedback data is punched into the system. Hence they are dynamic (stochastic in nature) with their value changing as and when more feedback data keep flowing in. The most simple feedback system is where a customer is just asked whether they liked/disliked a product. The sequence of responses then would look like the output of a coin toss experiment (with heads/approval would be scored as 1 and tails/disapproval would be 0). At any point of time the overall mean would then be reported as the Approval Rating Score. The sequence of all running means, updated with the latest feedback data from customers, would form the "APPROVAL RATING VECTOR" or "ARV" for short. If we take a look at a sequence of evolution of the approval rating score with newer feedbacks, we would realise that even though we are using the last available data as the latest rating the whole path and the data hidden behind that path is never actually used. In Finance for example a measure called IRR (Internal Rate of Return) would describe the whole yield curve. While IRR is a single number, it is derived by using the information from the whole path followed by the yield curve. Similar mechanism is also present in the field of quantitative finance where the zero coupon bond prices would be calculated from the expected value of the continuous compounding of the rates which could be described by any popular short rate model. The short rate model parameters are calculated by taking in information of whole path of evolution of the interest rate. While the future is predicted by calculating the expectation over all possible future paths that the interest rate could take. The point is that the expectation is taken over the whole path. The prevailing interest rate today is not the only component used for pricing the zero coupon bond. Approval ratings however are just described by the present mean/weighted mean, and do not use the information provided by the path it took to reach to the present value, devoiding us the power to predict its future.
评价与评分系统的随机微分方程
如今,反馈和评级/评分系统几乎无处不在。一般来说,客户被要求对产品进行1到10,或1到5或任何其他正实数评分。然后,平均分数将为产品的定性评估提供依据。例如,电影将由观众和影评人来评分。这些反馈分数的平均值或加权平均值将成为他们的“APPROVAL RATING”或简称为“AR”。因此,批准评级是对产品批准/不批准的集中趋势的度量。但随着新的反馈数据输入系统,这些支持率也在不断变化。因此,它们是动态的(本质上是随机的),当更多的反馈数据不断流入时,它们的值会发生变化。最简单的反馈系统就是询问顾客是否喜欢或不喜欢某种产品。然后,反应序列看起来就像抛硬币实验的输出(正面/赞成的得分为1,反面/不赞成的得分为0)。在任何时候,总体平均值都会被报告为赞成评级得分。所有运行手段的顺序,加上客户的最新反馈数据,将形成“APPROVAL RATING VECTOR”或简称“ARV”。如果我们看一下带有更新反馈的认可评级分数的演变序列,我们会意识到,即使我们使用最后可用的数据作为最新评级,整个路径和隐藏在该路径后面的数据从未真正使用过。例如,在金融领域,内部收益率(IRR)可以描述整个收益率曲线。虽然内部收益率是一个单一的数字,但它是通过使用收益率曲线所遵循的整个路径的信息推导出来的。类似的机制也存在于定量金融领域,其中零息债券价格将从利率连续复合的期望值计算出来,这可以用任何流行的短期利率模型来描述。考虑利率演变的整个路径信息,计算短期利率模型参数。而未来是通过计算未来所有可能的利率路径的期望来预测的。关键是期望占据了整个路径。目前的现行利率并不是零息债券定价的唯一因素。然而,支持率只是用当前平均值/加权平均值来描述的,并没有使用它达到现值的路径所提供的信息,从而剥夺了我们预测其未来的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信