I. R. Zarkasi, Cut Meutia Karolina, Muhammad Shaddam Rizqullah
{"title":"The #permendikbud30 Controversy Over the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education on Social Media","authors":"I. R. Zarkasi, Cut Meutia Karolina, Muhammad Shaddam Rizqullah","doi":"10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversy over the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation (Permendikbudristek) Number 30 of 2021 on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education is interesting to study. Criticism of this regulation, among others, Article 5, which carries the phrase “without the consent of the victim”, raises the meaning of legalizing immoral acts and consent-based free sex. Along with this polemic, reports and news about sexual violence in colleges have also emerged. This debate also occurs in society, especially with the presence of digital media, which makes a discourse grow fast and expand. Various comments and discussions occurred in various media, especially social media. This research using the concept of participatory culture aims to get an overview of public comments through the social media Twitter #permendikbud30, which contains uploads and comments regarding the controversy over Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 and will be carried out through netnography studies. Finally, the results of the analysis show a picture of the diversity of people’s perspectives in giving their opinions, namely: (a) by analogy with verses in the Quran; (b) there are many cases whose handling is not in favor of the victim and a firm law is needed; (c) educational institutions have not been responsive in handling cases that have occurred; (d) there is still polarization in politics, especially related to identity politics and (e) support for the relevant ministries for the ratification of this regulation is an important contribution to handling cases of sexual violence in the campus.","PeriodicalId":228204,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The controversy over the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation (Permendikbudristek) Number 30 of 2021 on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education is interesting to study. Criticism of this regulation, among others, Article 5, which carries the phrase “without the consent of the victim”, raises the meaning of legalizing immoral acts and consent-based free sex. Along with this polemic, reports and news about sexual violence in colleges have also emerged. This debate also occurs in society, especially with the presence of digital media, which makes a discourse grow fast and expand. Various comments and discussions occurred in various media, especially social media. This research using the concept of participatory culture aims to get an overview of public comments through the social media Twitter #permendikbud30, which contains uploads and comments regarding the controversy over Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 and will be carried out through netnography studies. Finally, the results of the analysis show a picture of the diversity of people’s perspectives in giving their opinions, namely: (a) by analogy with verses in the Quran; (b) there are many cases whose handling is not in favor of the victim and a firm law is needed; (c) educational institutions have not been responsive in handling cases that have occurred; (d) there is still polarization in politics, especially related to identity politics and (e) support for the relevant ministries for the ratification of this regulation is an important contribution to handling cases of sexual violence in the campus.
教育和文化部长条例(Permendikbudristek) 2021年第30号关于预防和处理高等教育中的性暴力的争议值得研究。对这项规定的批评,其中包括载有“未经受害者同意”一词的第5条,提出了将不道德行为和基于同意的自由性行为合法化的含义。随着这场争论,有关大学性暴力的报道和新闻也出现了。这种争论也发生在社会上,特别是随着数字媒体的存在,使得一种话语快速增长和扩大。各种媒体,尤其是社交媒体上出现了各种评论和讨论。本研究使用参与式文化的概念,旨在通过社交媒体Twitter #permendikbud30获得公众评论的概述,其中包含有关2021年Permendikbudristek Number 30争议的上传和评论,并将通过网络研究进行。最后,分析结果显示了人们在给出意见时的观点的多样性,即:(a)通过《古兰经》中的经文进行类比;(二)有许多案件的处理对受害人不利,需要有坚定的法律;(三)教育机构在处理已发生的个案时没有作出回应;(d)政治上仍然存在两极分化,特别是与身份政治有关的两极分化;(e)支持相关部委批准该条例是对处理校园性暴力案件的重要贡献。