Status of Medical Devices and their Utilization in 9 Tertiary Hospitals and 5 Research institutions in Uganda

R. Ssekitoleko, B. N. Arinda, Solomon Oshabahebwa, L. K. Namuli, Julius Mugaga, C. Namayega, E. Opolot, Jackline Baluka, C. Ibingira, I. Munabi, M. Joloba
{"title":"Status of Medical Devices and their Utilization in 9 Tertiary Hospitals and 5 Research institutions in Uganda","authors":"R. Ssekitoleko, B. N. Arinda, Solomon Oshabahebwa, L. K. Namuli, Julius Mugaga, C. Namayega, E. Opolot, Jackline Baluka, C. Ibingira, I. Munabi, M. Joloba","doi":"10.31354/GLOBALCE.V4I3.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds and Objective: Advancements in technology have led to great strides in research and innovation that have improved healthcare provision around the world. However, the majority of the technology available is underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, the ever-increasing sophistication and cost of medical equipment means that access and proper use is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is, however, a general paucity of well-documented evidence for the utilization of medical equipment in LMICs. Therefore, this study evaluates the current availability and utilization of medical equipment in tertiary hospitals and research facilities in Uganda and provides baseline information to clinical/biomedical engineers, innovators, managers, and policymakers.Material and Methods: The study evaluated the equipment currently used in 9 purposively selected public tertiary hospitals and 5 research laboratories representing different regions of Uganda. Data were collected by personnel specialized in biomedical engineering utilizing a mixed-method approach that involved inventory taking and surveys directed to the health workers in the designated health facilities. Results: The hospitals contributed 1995 (85%) pieces of medical equipment while the research laboratories contributed 343 (15%) pieces amounting to 2338 pieces of equipment involved in the study. On average, 34% of the medical equipment in the health facilities was faulty, and 85.6% lacked manuals.Discussion and conclusion: Although innovative solutions and donated equipment address the immediate and long-term goals of resource-constrained settings, our study demonstrated several issues around existing medical devices, and these need immediate attention.","PeriodicalId":318587,"journal":{"name":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31354/GLOBALCE.V4I3.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objective: Advancements in technology have led to great strides in research and innovation that have improved healthcare provision around the world. However, the majority of the technology available is underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, the ever-increasing sophistication and cost of medical equipment means that access and proper use is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is, however, a general paucity of well-documented evidence for the utilization of medical equipment in LMICs. Therefore, this study evaluates the current availability and utilization of medical equipment in tertiary hospitals and research facilities in Uganda and provides baseline information to clinical/biomedical engineers, innovators, managers, and policymakers.Material and Methods: The study evaluated the equipment currently used in 9 purposively selected public tertiary hospitals and 5 research laboratories representing different regions of Uganda. Data were collected by personnel specialized in biomedical engineering utilizing a mixed-method approach that involved inventory taking and surveys directed to the health workers in the designated health facilities. Results: The hospitals contributed 1995 (85%) pieces of medical equipment while the research laboratories contributed 343 (15%) pieces amounting to 2338 pieces of equipment involved in the study. On average, 34% of the medical equipment in the health facilities was faulty, and 85.6% lacked manuals.Discussion and conclusion: Although innovative solutions and donated equipment address the immediate and long-term goals of resource-constrained settings, our study demonstrated several issues around existing medical devices, and these need immediate attention.
乌干达9所三级医院和5所研究机构医疗器械现状及其使用情况
背景和目的:技术的进步导致了研究和创新的巨大进步,改善了世界各地的医疗保健服务。但是,在撒哈拉以南非洲,现有的大多数技术没有得到充分利用。此外,医疗设备的复杂性和成本不断提高,意味着在低收入和中等收入国家获得和正确使用医疗设备的机会有限。然而,关于中低收入国家使用医疗设备的充分证据普遍缺乏。因此,本研究评估了乌干达三级医院和研究机构目前医疗设备的可用性和利用率,并为临床/生物医学工程师、创新者、管理人员和决策者提供了基线信息。材料和方法:该研究评估了目前在乌干达不同地区有目的地选择的9所公立三级医院和5个研究实验室使用的设备。数据由专门从事生物医学工程的人员收集,采用混合方法,包括对指定卫生设施的卫生工作者进行清查和调查。结果:医院提供医疗设备1995件(85%),研究实验室提供医疗设备343件(15%),共2338件。平均而言,卫生设施中34%的医疗设备有缺陷,85.6%缺乏手册。讨论和结论:虽然创新的解决方案和捐赠的设备解决了资源受限环境的近期和长期目标,但我们的研究表明,围绕现有医疗设备存在一些问题,这些问题需要立即得到关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书