Addressing colorectal cancer disparities: the identification of geographic targets for screening interventions in Miami-Dade County, Florida

Recinda Sherman, Kevin A. Henry, David J Lee
{"title":"Addressing colorectal cancer disparities: the identification of geographic targets for screening interventions in Miami-Dade County, Florida","authors":"Recinda Sherman, Kevin A. Henry, David J Lee","doi":"10.1145/2452516.2452520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an analysis of spatial clustering of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The objective was to identify geographically based targets for colorectal cancer screening interventions for Blacks and Hispanic Whites, two groups with demonstrated disparities in stage at diagnosis and mortality for CRC. The initial cluster detection analysis identified areas with high risk of late stage CRC, however, none of the results were statistically significant.\n The analysis was not based on an academic research question, but instead was an application intended to guide appropriate and targeted strategies for high risk populations. Only about 50% of the general population receives CRC screening, so, while all groups would benefit from increased CRC screening, high risk communities may potentially benefit the most. Because public health resources are limited, geographically targeting high risk populations for enhanced screening efforts is pragmatic public health policy.\n Despite the lack of statically significant results, we still needed to develop a helpful answer to the question, where should we market a screening intervention?\n The selected geographic areas must have real potential for attenuating excess CRC burden through increased screening efforts. Through evaluating a combination of clusters of late stage and overall CRC risk (two separate models of cluster detection), probable communities with low CRC screening uptake were identified. Although they did not meet statistical significance, they were determined to have public health importance.","PeriodicalId":168309,"journal":{"name":"HealthGIS '12","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthGIS '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2452516.2452520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper describes an analysis of spatial clustering of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The objective was to identify geographically based targets for colorectal cancer screening interventions for Blacks and Hispanic Whites, two groups with demonstrated disparities in stage at diagnosis and mortality for CRC. The initial cluster detection analysis identified areas with high risk of late stage CRC, however, none of the results were statistically significant. The analysis was not based on an academic research question, but instead was an application intended to guide appropriate and targeted strategies for high risk populations. Only about 50% of the general population receives CRC screening, so, while all groups would benefit from increased CRC screening, high risk communities may potentially benefit the most. Because public health resources are limited, geographically targeting high risk populations for enhanced screening efforts is pragmatic public health policy. Despite the lack of statically significant results, we still needed to develop a helpful answer to the question, where should we market a screening intervention? The selected geographic areas must have real potential for attenuating excess CRC burden through increased screening efforts. Through evaluating a combination of clusters of late stage and overall CRC risk (two separate models of cluster detection), probable communities with low CRC screening uptake were identified. Although they did not meet statistical significance, they were determined to have public health importance.
解决结直肠癌差异:确定佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县筛查干预的地理目标
本文描述了佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县结直肠癌(CRC)的空间聚类分析。目的是确定黑人和西班牙裔白人结肠直肠癌筛查干预措施的地理目标,这两个群体在CRC的诊断阶段和死亡率方面存在差异。最初的聚类检测分析确定了晚期结直肠癌的高风险区域,然而,所有结果都没有统计学意义。该分析不是基于一个学术研究问题,而是一个旨在指导高风险人群采取适当和有针对性策略的应用程序。只有大约50%的普通人群接受了结直肠癌筛查,因此,虽然所有人群都将从增加的结直肠癌筛查中受益,但高风险社区可能受益最大。由于公共卫生资源有限,在地理上针对高危人群加强筛查工作是实用的公共卫生政策。尽管缺乏统计学上显著的结果,我们仍然需要找到一个有用的答案来回答这个问题,我们应该在哪里推销筛查干预?选定的地理区域必须具有通过增加筛查工作来减轻过度结直肠癌负担的真正潜力。通过评估晚期和整体CRC风险集群(两种独立的集群检测模型)的组合,确定了CRC筛查率较低的可能社区。虽然它们没有达到统计学意义,但它们被确定具有公共卫生重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信