Comparative Analysis of SRTM and ASTER GDEMs in Topographic and Hydrological Modeling of Onitsha and Environs, Anambra State, Nigeria

J. Ejikeme, J. Igbokwe, Daniel Umenweke, E. Ugwu
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of SRTM and ASTER GDEMs in Topographic and Hydrological Modeling of Onitsha and Environs, Anambra State, Nigeria","authors":"J. Ejikeme, J. Igbokwe, Daniel Umenweke, E. Ugwu","doi":"10.14445/23939206/ijggs-v6i2p103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare and analyze the three most freely available global elevation data set (SRTM and ASTER version 1 and version 2) for topographic and hydrologic modeling of Onitsha and environs using 1:50000 topographic map of the study area as the reference DEM. The contour lines of the topographic map were digitized and their equivalent values used to generate the topographic DEM. The topographic DEM was reclassified and used to determine the impact of terrain configurations on the DEMs. LandSat-7ETM+ was classified and used to determine the influence of landuse/ landcover on the DEMs. Hypothesis testing was used to determine the most suitable datasets for topographic and hydrological modeling in the study area using the ztest statistical analysis. SRTM was tested against ASTER ver1, and ASTER ver2. ASTER ver2 was tested against ASTER ver1. The study revealed that there is enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from SRTM is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver1. Also, the hypothesis testing between SRTM and ASTER ver2 revealed that there is enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from SRTM is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver2 dataset. For hypothesis testing between ASTER ver2 and ASTER ver1, the study shows that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from ASTER ver2 dataset is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver1. The result of the hypothesis testing revealed that SRTM is most suitable for topographic and hydrological modeling in Onitsha and Environs. The study recommends the use of SRTM for topographic and hydrologic modeling of Onitsha and Environs and other areas of similar topography representation.","PeriodicalId":364345,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14445/23939206/ijggs-v6i2p103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare and analyze the three most freely available global elevation data set (SRTM and ASTER version 1 and version 2) for topographic and hydrologic modeling of Onitsha and environs using 1:50000 topographic map of the study area as the reference DEM. The contour lines of the topographic map were digitized and their equivalent values used to generate the topographic DEM. The topographic DEM was reclassified and used to determine the impact of terrain configurations on the DEMs. LandSat-7ETM+ was classified and used to determine the influence of landuse/ landcover on the DEMs. Hypothesis testing was used to determine the most suitable datasets for topographic and hydrological modeling in the study area using the ztest statistical analysis. SRTM was tested against ASTER ver1, and ASTER ver2. ASTER ver2 was tested against ASTER ver1. The study revealed that there is enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from SRTM is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver1. Also, the hypothesis testing between SRTM and ASTER ver2 revealed that there is enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from SRTM is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver2 dataset. For hypothesis testing between ASTER ver2 and ASTER ver1, the study shows that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that elevation values obtained from ASTER ver2 dataset is a better representation of the earth surface than ASTER ver1. The result of the hypothesis testing revealed that SRTM is most suitable for topographic and hydrological modeling in Onitsha and Environs. The study recommends the use of SRTM for topographic and hydrologic modeling of Onitsha and Environs and other areas of similar topography representation.
SRTM与ASTER gdem在尼日利亚阿南布拉州Onitsha及周边地区地形水文模拟中的对比分析
本研究以研究区1:5万地形图为参考DEM,比较分析了3个最免费的全球高程数据集(SRTM和ASTER版本1和版本2),用于欧尼沙及其周边地区的地形和水文建模。将地形图的等高线数字化,并利用等高线的等值值生成地形DEM。将地形DEM重新分类并用于确定地形配置对DEM的影响。LandSat-7ETM+被分类并用于确定土地利用/土地覆盖对dem的影响。采用ztest统计分析方法,通过假设检验确定最适合研究区地形和水文建模的数据集。SRTM对ASTER ver1和ASTER ver2进行了检测。ASTER 2与ASTER 1进行对照试验。研究表明,有足够的证据支持SRTM获得的高程值比ASTER ver1更好地代表地球表面的说法。此外,SRTM与ASTER ver2的假设检验表明,SRTM获得的高程值比ASTER ver2数据集更能代表地表。对于ASTER ver2和ASTER ver1之间的假设检验,研究表明,没有足够的证据支持ASTER ver2数据集获得的高程值比ASTER ver1更好地代表地球表面的说法。假设检验结果表明,SRTM最适合于奥尼沙及其周边地区的地形和水文模拟。该研究建议使用SRTM对奥尼沙及其周边地区和其他具有类似地形特征的地区进行地形和水文模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信