Improving CSE software through reproducibility requirements

SECSE '11 Pub Date : 2011-05-28 DOI:10.1145/1985782.1985787
M. Heroux
{"title":"Improving CSE software through reproducibility requirements","authors":"M. Heroux","doi":"10.1145/1985782.1985787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often observed that software engineering (SE) processes and practices for computational science and engineering (CSE) lag behind other SE areas [7]. This issue has been a concern for funding agencies, since new research increasingly relies upon and produces computational tools. At the same time, CSE research organizations find it difficult to prescribe formal SE practices for funded projects.\n Theoretical and experimental science rely heavily on independent verification of results as part of the scientific process. Computational science should have the same regard for independent verification but it does not.\n In this paper, we present an argument for using reproducibility and independent verification requirements as a driver to improve SE processes and practices. We describe existing efforts that support our argument, how these requirements can impact SE, challenges we face, and new opportunities for using reproducibility requirements as a driver for higher quality CSE software.","PeriodicalId":359782,"journal":{"name":"SECSE '11","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SECSE '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1985782.1985787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is often observed that software engineering (SE) processes and practices for computational science and engineering (CSE) lag behind other SE areas [7]. This issue has been a concern for funding agencies, since new research increasingly relies upon and produces computational tools. At the same time, CSE research organizations find it difficult to prescribe formal SE practices for funded projects. Theoretical and experimental science rely heavily on independent verification of results as part of the scientific process. Computational science should have the same regard for independent verification but it does not. In this paper, we present an argument for using reproducibility and independent verification requirements as a driver to improve SE processes and practices. We describe existing efforts that support our argument, how these requirements can impact SE, challenges we face, and new opportunities for using reproducibility requirements as a driver for higher quality CSE software.
通过再现性需求改进CSE软件
人们经常观察到,计算科学与工程(CSE)的软件工程(SE)过程和实践落后于其他SE领域[7]。这个问题一直是资助机构关注的问题,因为新的研究越来越依赖并产生计算工具。同时,CSE研究组织发现很难为资助的项目规定正式的SE实践。作为科学过程的一部分,理论科学和实验科学在很大程度上依赖于对结果的独立验证。计算科学应该同样重视独立验证,但它没有。在本文中,我们提出了使用可再现性和独立验证需求作为改进SE过程和实践的驱动的论据。我们描述了支持我们论点的现有工作,这些需求如何影响CSE,我们面临的挑战,以及使用可再现性需求作为更高质量CSE软件的驱动的新机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信