Simple Mechanisms for Profit Maximization in Multi-item Auctions

Yang Cai, Mingfei Zhao
{"title":"Simple Mechanisms for Profit Maximization in Multi-item Auctions","authors":"Yang Cai, Mingfei Zhao","doi":"10.1145/3328526.3329616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study a classical Bayesian mechanism design problem where a seller is selling multiple items to a buyer. We consider the case where the seller has costs to produce the items, and these costs are private information to the seller. How can the seller design a mechanism to maximize her profit? Two well-studied problems, revenue maximization in multi-item auctions and signaling in ad auctions, are special cases of our problem. We show that there exists a simple mechanism whose profit is at least 1/11 the optimal profit, when the buyer has a constraint-additive valuation over independent items. The approximation factor becomes 6 when the buyer is additive. Our result holds even when the seller's costs are correlated across items. We introduce a new class of mechanisms called permit-selling mechanisms. These mechanisms have two stages. For each item i, we create a separate permit that allows the buyer to purchase the item at its cost. In the first stage, we sell the permits without revealing any information about the costs. In the second stage, the seller reveals all the costs, and the buyer can buy item i by only paying the cost $c_i$ if the buyer has purchased the permit for item i in the first stage. We show that the best permit-selling mechanism or the best posted price mechanism is already a constant factor approximation to the optimal profit (6 for additive, and 11 for constrained additive). Indeed, we do not require the optimal permit-selling mechanism, only selling the permits separately or as a grand bundle suffices to achieve the above approximation ratio. Our proof is enabled by constructing a benchmark for the optimal profit via a novel dual solution and a new connection to revenue maximization in multi-item auctions with a subadditive bidder.","PeriodicalId":416173,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We study a classical Bayesian mechanism design problem where a seller is selling multiple items to a buyer. We consider the case where the seller has costs to produce the items, and these costs are private information to the seller. How can the seller design a mechanism to maximize her profit? Two well-studied problems, revenue maximization in multi-item auctions and signaling in ad auctions, are special cases of our problem. We show that there exists a simple mechanism whose profit is at least 1/11 the optimal profit, when the buyer has a constraint-additive valuation over independent items. The approximation factor becomes 6 when the buyer is additive. Our result holds even when the seller's costs are correlated across items. We introduce a new class of mechanisms called permit-selling mechanisms. These mechanisms have two stages. For each item i, we create a separate permit that allows the buyer to purchase the item at its cost. In the first stage, we sell the permits without revealing any information about the costs. In the second stage, the seller reveals all the costs, and the buyer can buy item i by only paying the cost $c_i$ if the buyer has purchased the permit for item i in the first stage. We show that the best permit-selling mechanism or the best posted price mechanism is already a constant factor approximation to the optimal profit (6 for additive, and 11 for constrained additive). Indeed, we do not require the optimal permit-selling mechanism, only selling the permits separately or as a grand bundle suffices to achieve the above approximation ratio. Our proof is enabled by constructing a benchmark for the optimal profit via a novel dual solution and a new connection to revenue maximization in multi-item auctions with a subadditive bidder.
多物品拍卖中利润最大化的简单机制
我们研究了一个经典的贝叶斯机制设计问题,其中卖方向买方出售多件商品。我们考虑这样一种情况,即卖方有生产商品的成本,而这些成本对卖方来说是私有信息。卖方如何设计一种机制来最大化她的利润?多物品拍卖中的收益最大化和广告拍卖中的信号传递是我们问题的特例。我们证明了存在一个简单的机制,当买方对独立项目具有约束加性估值时,其利润至少是最优利润的1/11。当买方为可加性时,近似因子变为6。即使卖家的成本在各个项目之间是相关的,我们的结果也成立。我们引入了一类新的机制,称为许可销售机制。这些机制有两个阶段。对于每个项目i,我们创建一个单独的许可证,允许买方以其成本购买该项目。在第一阶段,我们出售许可证,不透露任何有关成本的信息。在第二阶段,卖方披露了所有成本,如果买方在第一阶段购买了物品i的许可证,则买方只需支付成本$c_i$即可购买物品i。我们表明,最佳许可销售机制或最佳公布价格机制已经是最优利润的常数因子近似(加法为6,约束加法为11)。实际上,我们并不需要最优的许可证出售机制,只要单独出售或捆绑出售许可证就足以达到上述近似比率。我们的证明是通过构建一个最优利润的基准,通过一个新的对偶解决方案和一个新的连接到与次可加投标人的多项目拍卖的收益最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信