Concluding Remarks

H. Steensma, Xiao-ping Chen
{"title":"Concluding Remarks","authors":"H. Steensma, Xiao-ping Chen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190070717.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We set out to uncover common themes and, perhaps, some disparities in the career stories from exemplar scholars in the field of organizational studies. Along with Robinson and Sorenson, we caution readers to be mindful of the inherent limitations of post hoc sense making. All of our contributors have reflected on their own paths toward success through their own biased lenses. Moreover, we have sampled on the dependent variable and have not considered the paths of those whose efforts have led to more modest success. Nonetheless, for rising scholars and those considering academic careers in organizational studies, consistencies across these individuals may provide some points to ponder. While none of the factors described by the exemplars profiled in this book is likely sufficient to achieve their level of success, one can speculate on the necessity of these factors....","PeriodicalId":312939,"journal":{"name":"A Journey toward Influential Scholarship","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Journey toward Influential Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190070717.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We set out to uncover common themes and, perhaps, some disparities in the career stories from exemplar scholars in the field of organizational studies. Along with Robinson and Sorenson, we caution readers to be mindful of the inherent limitations of post hoc sense making. All of our contributors have reflected on their own paths toward success through their own biased lenses. Moreover, we have sampled on the dependent variable and have not considered the paths of those whose efforts have led to more modest success. Nonetheless, for rising scholars and those considering academic careers in organizational studies, consistencies across these individuals may provide some points to ponder. While none of the factors described by the exemplars profiled in this book is likely sufficient to achieve their level of success, one can speculate on the necessity of these factors....
结束语
我们从组织研究领域的模范学者的职业故事中发现了共同的主题,也许还有一些差异。与罗宾逊和索伦森一样,我们提醒读者要注意事后意义构建的固有局限性。我们所有的撰稿人都通过他们自己的偏见镜头反思了他们自己的成功之路。此外,我们对因变量进行了抽样,并没有考虑到那些努力导致更适度成功的人的道路。尽管如此,对于那些正在崛起的学者和那些考虑在组织研究领域从事学术生涯的人来说,这些人之间的一致性可能会提供一些值得思考的点。虽然本书中所描述的例子所描述的因素都不足以达到他们的成功水平,但人们可以推测这些因素的必要性....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信